Showstoppers
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 78 articles for 0.001 sec
[cvs] [Wiki] renamed: ShowStoppers, ShowStoppersThreeOh     

Group: mailing.www.horde-cvs · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in mailing.www.horde-cvs
Author: Chuck Hagenbuch
Date: Jan 5, 2007 14:22

chuck Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:21:38 -0800 Renamed "ShowStoppers" to "ShowStoppersThreeOh". New page: http://wiki.horde.org/ShowStoppersThreeOh -- To unsubscribe, mail: cvs-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
Show full article (0.20Kb)
[cvs] [Wiki] changed: ShowStoppers     

Group: mailing.www.horde-cvs · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in mailing.www.horde-cvs
Author: Jan Schneider
Date: Jan 5, 2007 02:12

jan Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:10:49 -0800 Modified page: http://wiki.horde.org/ShowStoppers New Revision: 1.29 Change log: Note version @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -+ Release Show Stoppers ++ Horde 3.0 Release Show Stoppers ++ All modules * Convert remaining conf.php.dist files to conf.xml files (DONE). -- To unsubscribe, mail: cvs-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
Show full article (0.37Kb)
Re: F-35 coming along as planned. Never.     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in aus.aviation
Author: Addinall
Date: Sep 18, 2008 22:42

... problems such as aircraft weight and range have apparently been solved, questions about the release of the computer source code that makes the aircraft so unique have emerged as a potential showstopper for international clients. The source code in question refers to the millions of lines of computer code that allow this 21st-century aircraft to fly and to fight. Without complete access to ...
Show full article (7.11Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Nvidia dependencies     

Group: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
Author: Random C
Date: May 20, 2008 14:31

... Now nvsvc32.exe is definitely in \windows\system32\, so it must be some other file. However, I ran the install with filemon running, and I can't see anything that would be a showstopper. Any ideas on what may be missing in the image to cause this sort of error? Thanks, Dean "Ionut Constantinescu" <ad...@radu-negru.ro> wrote in message news:u8rgjxBuIHA.1768@...
Show full article (3.73Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Nvidia dependencies     

Group: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
Author: DPM
Date: May 19, 2008 07:48

... Now nvsvc32.exe is definitely in \windows\system32\, so it must be some other file. However, I ran the install with filemon running, and I can't see anything that would be a showstopper. Any ideas on what may be missing in the image to cause this sort of error? Thanks, Dean "Ionut Constantinescu" <admin@radu-negru.ro> wrote in message news:u8rgjxBuIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Show full article (3.40Kb) · Show article thread
CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in comp.lang.fortran
Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 14, 2008 18:13

... up a bug in gfortran (PR36186) for which the fix is in the pipeline and the REAL version didn't turn up anything, but the INT version ran into a showstopper that keeps it from compiling: C:\gfortran\james\intrinsics\int>type bug1.f90 module bugmod parameter(ik1 = selected_int_kind(2)) implicit complex (P) contains subroutine bug1(P1) use mykinds1 ...
Show full article (1.35Kb)
Re: CMPLX and constant folding     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in comp.lang.fortran
Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 11, 2008 20:56

.... Thanks. (Still sure you don't want to open a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla account?) I was on the cusp of doing that at one point in time but there was something that was a showstopper for me, although I can't remember what it was just off the top of my head. In http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36214 I noticed that if you print out rd, you get 0000000040295400 with the...
Show full article (0.93Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Ron Ford
Date: May 6, 2008 15:34

... and for initialization and ordinary expressions. I haven't done specification expressions yet because so far they seem to be going the same way as ordinary expressions and gfortran has showstopper issues that have been outstanding for quite a while that might make it more difficult to implement a testing regime for specification expressions. I haven't touched the issue of ...
Show full article (7.83Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in comp.lang.fortran
Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 6, 2008 12:50

... all KINDs and for initialization and ordinary expressions. I haven't done specification expressions yet because so far they seem to be going the same way as ordinary expressions and gfortran has showstopper issues that have been outstanding for quite a while that might make it more difficult to implement a testing regime for specification expressions. I haven't touched the issue of array ...
Show full article (5.93Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The Promise of Forth     

Group: comp.lang.forth · Group Profile · Search for Showstoppers in comp.lang.forth
Author: Jonah Thomas
Date: May 4, 2008 21:37

... 8.4 of the language and you run into some code that demands version 6.2 (which has significant incompatibilities or they wouldn't have given it a new major version number) how hard would it be to switch? Could we get a compact easy toolchain? Suppose there were lots of Forthy advantages but the compiled code ran half as fast as a competing compiler written in C. Would that be a showstopper?
Show full article (20.11Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · next