...55:35 -0700 (PDT), Michael Gordge <mikegordge@xtra.co.nz> wrote: So why not a dependence of objects awakening his experiences to begin his knowledge of time and space and intuit and sensibilty and a priori temporal and spatial transcendental and distance Tim? Melon ran away from that question and I bet ewe do too. Your question is nonsense. Should I run away from nonsense? And did...

... of *objects* awakening man's experiences to BEGIN ALL of his knowledge". So why not a dependence of objects awakening his experiences to begin his knowledge of time and space and intuit and sensibilty and a priori temporal and spatial transcendental and distance Tim? Melon ran away from that question and I bet ewe do too. The mystic's claim their knowledge a god does not depend on ...

...cares? I'm still waiting for Melon to explain what objects or events awaken man's experiences of intuit and sensibility, so as to try and make some sense of Kant's dopey non-sense, that man's knowledge a priori of time and space somehow comes from man's knowledge of intuit and sensibilty, someone needs to stop the merry-go- round before Melon gets giddy and falls off it. MG

... of the concepts time, that dopey Kant a priori crap, intuit, space and sensibility. And soooo far the only thing you've offered as an explanation to the beginning of your knowledge of time, intuit, sensibilty and the a priori crap is, "Kant", which is like the mystics blaming god for what they dont want to know and dont want to understand. You're carrying on like the second mystic who ...

... dope. Haven't you figured that out yet? You sound like a total fucktard. so as to try and make some sense of Kant's dopey non-sense, that man's knowledge a priori of time and space somehow comes from man's knowledge of intuit and sensibilty, someone needs to stop the merry-go- round before Melon gets giddy and falls off it. MG -- Such little questions, so many times...

...But anyway who cares? I'm still waiting for Melon to explain what objects or events awaken man's experiences of intuit and sensibility, so as to try and make some sense of Kant's dopey non-sense, that man's knowledge a priori of time and space somehow comes from man's knowledge of intuit and sensibilty, someone needs to stop the merry-go- round before Melon gets giddy and falls off it. MG

... question, what material objects and or events does man experience to begin his knowledge of untuit and sensibilty? Remember to keep the context. Shut the fuck up, I don't need a crude kindergarten level ... knowledge of time and space and soooo I am seeing if the means he used "intuit and sensibilty" are also knowledge founded upon his idea that ALL of man's knowldege begins with (your ...

...question, what material objects and or events does man experience to begin his knowledge of untuit and sensibilty? Remember to keep the context. Which is, I am trying to find out ultimately what material ... knowledge of time and space and soooo I am seeing if the means he used "intuit and sensibilty" are also knowledge founded upon his idea that ALL of man's knowldege begins with (your words...

...re such a loser. Explain to the forum how anybody is supposed to understand this drivel: 'and you still cant explain what Kant was "experiencing" to beging his knowledge of "intuit" and "sensibilty" in his claim that time and space are knowledge man has via intuit and sensibility.' Did you graduate from kindergarten yet? You write like a total fucktard, your questions are nonsensical, and...

... goddess Rand's word for it. 10 years studying the moron of his century Kant, and you still cant explain what Kant was "experiencing" to beging his knowledge of "intuit" and "sensibilty" in his claim that time and space are knowledge man has via intuit and sensibility. Would you stop acting like such a usenet weirdo? Your writing style is barely literate. -- Such little ...