Sensationable
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 6 articles for 0.286 sec
Ok, I've changed my mind, and I'll take your bait, Neil. Your abject dishonesty needs some correction. On Jun 7, 9:03 am, Neil X <nei...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Larry wrote: > > > It...is...a...summary...and..."who"...penned...it...is...far...less...important... > > than...understanding...that...it...is...a...deliberately...brief,.... > > OK, on this we are in 100%% agreement. No, we are     

Group: rec.music.gdead · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in rec.music.gdead
Author: Joker
Date: Jun 7, 2010 21:56

On May 24, 6:34 pm, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote: On 5/24/2010 11:13 AM, harry k wrote: On May 24, 6:16 am, Linda Lee<lindagirl...@juno.com>  wrote: On May 23, 2:47 am, "Mike Painter"<md.pain...@sbcglobal.net>  wrote: LindaLeewrote: On May 22, 2:24 pm, "Mike Painter"<md.pain...@sbcglobal.net>  wrote: LindaLeeand Suzanne together again in the
Show full article (12.80Kb)
By Saeed Minhas ISLAMABAD: At last Premier Gilani has chosen to speak on the issue that currently dogs political discussions around the country, namely that fielding and supporting a convicted cheat like Jamshed Dasti in a by-election in Muzaffargarh is bringing a bad name not only to the prime minister, but his party as well. The PM broke his silence by telling the House on Thursday that there     

Group: alt.talk.creationism · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in alt.talk.creationism
Author: Suzanne
Date: Jun 1, 2010 01:13

By Saeed Minhas ISLAMABAD: At last Premier Gilani has chosen to speak on the issue that currently dogs political discussions around the country, namely that fielding and supporting a convicted cheat like Jamshed Dasti in a by-election in Muzaffargarh is bringing a bad name not only to the prime minister, but his party as well. The PM broke his silence by telling the House on Thursday that there
Show full article (3.71Kb)
On 1/28/2010 6:19 AM, Me, ...again! wrote: > > My comments farther down. > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, TheKeral wrote: > >> >> Wolpert's book is from 1989 (a couple of years after the Roop Kanwar >> case). The book is in its 8th edition now (published in 2008). What does >> old Stan have to say about India 19 years later? 'Silken saried >> civilization and its flames ...?' What kind of writing     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in talk.politics.misc
Author: Arun Bansi
Date: May 13, 2010 22:55

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: *Amendment IV* The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, *shall not be violated* , and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. July 31
Show full article (5.14Kb)
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in sci.military.naval
Author: Arun Bansi
Date: May 13, 2010 22:54

Show full article (5.14Kb)
    

Group: alt.computer.consultants · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in alt.computer.consultants
Author: TheKeral
Date: Jan 28, 2010 22:28

Show full article (6.50Kb)
    

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Sensationable in alt.politics.republican
Author: Day Brown
Date: Jan 28, 2010 19:43

Show full article (2.57Kb)