Secretarian
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 14 articles for 0.302 sec
<Andrew.O'Brien@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:1172949229.249583.73160@31g2000cwt.googlegroups.com... > Hey all, > > This is my first posting and I'm probably asking a question > which has probably been answered a thousand times but > I'll ask anyway. > I have been following the events in Iraq for sometime now > and doing research into the Middle East. In Iraq, I am > noticing that     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in talk.politics.mideast
Author: Stan Engel
Date: Mar 3, 2007 16:14

I am 31, the first time i voted was for Kerry simply because I thought Bush seemed "unintelligent" compared to Clinton. At that time, I was happy as long as I trusted the President was a very smart person. Now the main thing I focus on is the actual result of the Iraq war. We took out the leader. He was executed old school. A bunch of US troops died. A whole bunch of people like me, just
Show full article (2.00Kb) · Show article thread
What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the     

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in us.politics
Author: Aaron
Date: Feb 21, 2007 08:06

What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the
Show full article (11.33Kb)
What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the     

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in alt.politics.usa
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the
Show full article (1.08Kb)
What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the     

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in soc.veterans
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

What should be the hypothetical purpose of our military and political strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan? The same should be identical to ameliorating the causes of the military conflict in those reasons. Rather, the USA and it's allies are only addressing the practical actions that address the results of having no effective strategic plan in those regiions. Without greater direction to the
Show full article (1.08Kb)
This is guaranteed spam from unconfirmed opt-in mailing lists for spurious addresses at poopypants.com or other vanity domains. hormboy@fw.merk.com is a USENET spamtrap seed. ---------------------- From kggwrr@ak-ps.cz Sun Dec 24 03:17:36 2006 Received: from mx0.public.com (mx0.public.com [66.112.160.20]) by public.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kBO8HaA7090973 for <x@public.com     

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in alt.politics.usa
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

Alex Filonov wrote: am05@hotmail.com wrote: Alex Filonov wrote: The group was a lot smarter and more capable politically after Stalin period then before his rise. Wrong. Communist party in 1920s had a lot of bright people. Which were killed in 1930s. Compare Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Bukharin to Malenkov, Molotov, Bulganin.
Show full article (1.08Kb)
    

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in soc.veterans
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

Show full article (1.08Kb)
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in alt.politics.usa
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

Show full article (1.08Kb)
    

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in soc.veterans
Author: Marcus Aurelius
Date: Feb 2, 2007 12:58

Show full article (1.08Kb)
    

Group: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Author: USENET n.a.n-a.s reports
Date: Dec 24, 2006 01:00

Show full article (20.64Kb)
    

Group: soc.history.what-if · Group Profile · Search for Secretarian in soc.history.what-if
Author: am05
Date: Dec 7, 2006 07:32

Show full article (11.55Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next