|
|
 |
| found 9656 articles for 2.381 sec |
  |
Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Scienceness in sci.physics
Author: Pentcho Valev
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:35
On Jun 7, 12:28 pm, rick_s <h...@my.com> wrote: Those who aren't immortal won't even know it happened. You know that Newton wrote way more on the book of Revelations than he did on physics. He considered his work on Revelations his greatest work. he decoded the Book of Daniel and claimed that the world would not end prior to 2060. I know the people who spoke to Newton,
|
| Show full article (8.42Kb) |
Group: sci.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for Scienceness in sci.skeptic
Author: Immortalist
Date: Jun 7, 2010 19:41
On Jun 7, 5:08 am, rick_s <h...@my.com> wrote: On 6/7/2010 19:29, BURT wrote: I think that your definition of science is not broad enough to include It is the definition of science not mine. And that is the scientific method which we have just began to use. Hundreds of years are just a drop in the bucket by comparison to the future of science. Mitch Raemsch
|
| Show full article (26.12Kb) |
Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Scienceness in sci.physics
Author: Immortalist
Date: Jun 7, 2010 19:41
"rick_s" <here@my.com> wrote in message news:r9cPn.33783$TL5.15406@newsfe24.iad... On 6/7/2010 2:41, Inertial wrote: "rick_s" <here@my.com> wrote in message news:bZXOn.123152$gv4.3494@newsfe09.iad... On 6/7/2010 2:16, BURT wrote: Well what about the atomists? What about Aristotle, Galen, Pythagoras? They are considered pre-science but if you must take
|
| Show full article (26.12Kb) |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|
