....com> wrote We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing ... > established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. To take it ... a moustache scribbled on it. Maybe more like some modern artist deciding to paint ...As I said, it's not "Star Trek" as we know and like it. ...

...anybody@anywhere-anytime.com> wrote We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing something long established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. To take it to a ... Lisa with a moustache scribbled on it. Maybe more like some modern artist deciding to paint his own ...

"Anybody" <anybody@anywhere-anytime.com> wrote We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing something long established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. To take it to a silly extreme, if the museum wants to scribble a ...

...his back on scaffolding. Back with Trek, the reason it was made originally...prequel to it. Without giving away any spoilers here, so far the Trek..., even Pike. That's already more faithful to TOS than ENT ... incident - should a "new" Star Trek indeed be labeled as "New",... Do you believe any previous Trek movies changed too many fundamentals of the original Trek product? If so, which ones?...

...* they want with it. We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing something long established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. All the great art in ... of lying on his back on scaffolding. Back with Trek, the reason it was made originally was to make...

...* the property. They can do *whatever* they want with it. We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing something long established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. All the great art in the world has been created so that ...

...* the property. They can do *whatever* they want with it. We have yet to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely changing something long established just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. All the great art in the world has been created so that somebody...

... to see what the new Star Trek movie actually is, but the morality I'm talking about is completely... just for the sake stuffing more money in their pockets. To ... are in the wrong. "Star Trek" is not just a name ...I imagine we would tend to agree that the direction they are ... going to make the best Trek in our opinion. But that ... the hyperbole, wait for the movie, and then review it. If ...

"Quadibloc" <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote... I'd say at "worst", but it's certainly true the classic episodes will always exist. And it's not *Paramount's* fault that William Shatner is not as young as he used to be. I was referring to the best fit for the analogy, not its relative desirability, but how about we say, "the closest" just for clarity. GeneK

...> to do so, but morally they are in the wrong. Not even close. This is at best like a museum deciding to sell posters in its gift shop that have the Mona Lisa with a moustache scribbled on it. I'd say at "worst", but it's certainly true the classic episodes will always exist. And it's not *Paramount's* fault that William Shatner is not as young as he used to be. John Savard