Rustickated
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 15 articles for 0.303 sec
Clark wrote: > > Peter Farey wrote: > > > > "Roundtable" wrote: > > > > > > I disagree. > > So do I, but I don't think it's meant to be German. I now > think it's a phonetic spelling of "sith," and here's why. > > In the introduction to the 11 volume edition of Pepys Diary > edited by Latham & Matthews, in section (c)2, (page lviii of > Volume 1 of the Folio Society edition), Robert     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: Peter Farey
Date: Aug 31, 2008 03:10

>On Feb 23, 6:28 am, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: I want to illustrate my comment above about this guy being a poor writer. He says that he never replied to the "smear". Then he says that it was "beneath contempt" (a rather subjective comment), as if that quality somehow precludes his replying to it. That in fact is not what he meant. What he should have said is that
Show full article (15.44Kb) · Show article thread
On Feb 22, 10:23 pm, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 5:20 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 4:01 pm, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > This is precisely on-topic: > > > Oh, now you want a second chance? Very well. It, too, is meaningless. > > You obviously forgot what the topic is. It is Edward Said. Please take > > your meds. > > It's     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: dsharavi
Date: Feb 27, 2008 02:26

On Feb 22, 5:20 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 4:01 pm, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: This is precisely on-topic: Oh, now you want a second chance? Very well. It, too, is meaningless. You obviously forgot what the topic is. It is Edward Said. Please take your meds. It's also Karsh. That mistake was made by you. P.S. I skimmed the below in
Show full article (15.25Kb) · Show article thread
On Feb 22, 4:01 pm, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: > This is precisely on-topic: Oh, now you want a second chance? Very well. It, too, is meaningless. You obviously forgot what the topic is. It is Edward Said. Please take your meds. P.S. I skimmed the below in spite of the fact that it is irrelevant to the present topic. I don't know who this guy is, but he sure is an incredible crybaby     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: drahcir
Date: Feb 23, 2008 06:28

On Feb 22, 11:03 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote: NO SNIPS: for content On 22-Feb-2008, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 10:16 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 8:01 am, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 1:39 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Feb 21, 4:18 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com>
Show full article (15.38Kb) · Show article thread
This is precisely on-topic: On Feb 22, 9:32 am, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 10:16 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: Informed Comment Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute Thursday, October 12, 2006 Wikipedia, Karsh and Cole An encyclopedia article should be an objective accounting of     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: HHW
Date: Feb 22, 2008 19:23

On Feb 22, 10:16 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 8:01 am, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Feb 22, 1:39 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Feb 21, 4:18 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: Karsh's work on the Middle East has received criticism. Wow, who would have guessed? His work has "received criticism". Amazing
Show full article (12.60Kb) · Show article thread
On Feb 22, 8:01 am, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 1:39 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 21, 4:18 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Karsh's work on the Middle East has received criticism. > > Wow, who would have guessed? His work has "received criticism". > Amazing. > This "article", the author of which H doesn't even bother to give us,     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: drahcir
Date: Feb 22, 2008 15:20

On Feb 22, 1:39 am, HHW <coaster132...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Feb 21, 4:18 pm, drahcir <sued...@hotmail.com> wrote: Karsh's work on the Middle East has received criticism. Wow, who would have guessed? His work has "received criticism". Amazing. This "article", the author of which H doesn't even bother to give us, and for which he provides no link, is filled with punctuation errors. leading
Show full article (11.21Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: HHW
Date: Feb 22, 2008 13:04

Show full article (5.12Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: HHW
Date: Feb 22, 2008 13:01

Show full article (11.60Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: drahcir
Date: Feb 22, 2008 07:32

Show full article (4.18Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: HHW
Date: Feb 22, 2008 07:16

Show full article (3.44Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Rustickated in talk.politics.mideast
Author: drahcir
Date: Feb 22, 2008 06:01

Show full article (3.20Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next