GET GOOGLE ADS FREE-EBOOK - www.GetGOOGLEAdsFREE-EBOOK.com Watch the VIDEO on YOUTUBE... NOW! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACbWSZgc1hg An Internet MULTI-MILLIONAIRE is deliberately out to SHOW UP GOOGLE, Yahoo, MSN and every other BIG SEARCH ENGINE by giving away a MONSTER OF A SECRET... He GETs $87 MILLION in GOOGLE Pay-Per-Click Ads FREE! ... ...And Makes Over $314 MILLION as a Result
On Jun 8, 4:22 am, Daniel James <wastebas...@nospam.aaisp.org> wrote: In article <news:6b033oF37v6kaU1@mid.individual.net>, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: It's true that either version would be understood, but careful writers will blanch at seeing "one in three ... get" Nonsense. Which careful writers do you have in mind? It is not nonsense. There are a few 'trendy'
Lucifer said about: Re: Bush's IQ at 187 On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:50:04 -0700, Doug Bashford wrote (in article <A76dncTBt9q8ynzbnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d@pghconnect.com>): The IQ's for the Bush Boys, the three stooges of American politics, is now available: "IQ's" should read 'IQs". Apostrophes are NOT used for noun plurals, including acronyms. In true
Be afraid, be very afraid. And if you're not, you're just not trying By Mark Drolette Created Jul 19 2007 - 8:49am Did you know you stand a better chance of either being eaten by a shark (in your bed) or hearing George W. Bush use proper subject-verb agreement than you do of being the victim of a terrorist attack? From where does this information emanate? Well, I just made it up but if
Todd <burns417@aol.com> wrote I was just wondering whether the nouns and verbs following the introductory phrase in the sentence below should be singular or plural: "If the patrolman, or the the detectives afterwards, had examined the bathroom, he/they would have found that ...." If I rewrite the above sentence as follows, the problem is eliminated, but i'm not really
