...to China) empty, it's no significant extra cost to fill it with waste for someone who can do more with it than us. Or don't you want these countries to prosper and turn our rubish into something useful? Can't you read? Its shipped to 75 countries not just China. And? Does that not mean they're finding a use for it? -- Conor I only please one person per day. Today is...

... (to China) empty, it's no significant extra cost to fill it with waste for someone who can do more with it than us. Or don't you want these countries to prosper and turn our rubish into something useful? Can't you read? Its shipped to 75 countries not just China. This may shock you but boats delivering to the UK do come from other places than China. -- World Carfree ...

... normally head back (to China) empty, it's no significant extra cost to fill it with waste for someone who can do more with it than us. Or don't you want these countries to prosper and turn our rubish into something useful? Can't you read? Its shipped to 75 countries not just China. -- World Carfree Network http://www.worldcarfree.net/ Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

... (to China) empty, it's no significant extra cost to fill it with waste for someone who can do more with it than us. Or don't you want these countries to prosper and turn our rubish into something useful? Well, Doug doesn't want the ships travelling in either direction, of course. He doesn't want us to import anything except the food that's flown in from Kenya for him. Mark -- ...

... countries who use it to manufacture new products..." And your suggestion? Considering the amount of shpping that enters the UK full of goods and would normally head back (to China) empty, it's no significant extra cost to fill it with waste for someone who can do more with it than us. Or don't you want these countries to prosper and turn our rubish into something useful?

...else it would take, would we expect 'intelligent' output from that "bio computer". I think the answer is obvious. No matter how complex the computer is, "rubbish in = rubish out" would prevail. Where did that insight come from ? Imagination...beyond biochemistry. BOfL The nice thing about the AI debate is that we speculators do not have to ...

...else it would take, would we expect 'intelligent' output from that "bio computer". I think the answer is obvious. No matter how complex the computer is, "rubbish in = rubish out" would prevail. Where did that insight come from ? Imagination...beyond biochemistry. BOfL The nice thing about the AI debate is that we speculators do not have to ...

... else it would take, would we expect 'intelligent' output from that "bio computer". I think the answer is obvious. No matter how complex the computer is, "rubbish in = rubish out" would prevail. Where did that insight come from ? Imagination...beyond biochemistry. BOfL The nice thing about the AI debate is that we speculators do not have to come up ...

... would take, would we expect 'intelligent' output from that "bio computer". I think the answer is obvious. No matter how complex the computer is, "rubbish in = rubish out" would prevail. Where did that insight come from ? Imagination...beyond biochemistry. BOfL Certainly the most complex biological computer we have now already has too much...

... it would take, would we expect 'intelligent' output from that "bio computer". I think the answer is obvious. No matter how complex the computer is, "rubbish in = rubish out" would prevail. Where did that insight come from ? Imagination...beyond biochemistry. BOfL Certainly the most complex biological computer we have now already has too much trouble ...