... brain death has been determined … no criminal or civil liability will result from disconnecting the life- support devices." (Dority v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County, 193 Cal.Rptr. 288, 291 (1983)) Those people maintaining that only the neo-cortex of the brain is necessary for consciousness sometimes argue that only electrical activity there should be considered when defining ...

... the several opinions of the numerous judges who ruled) is the following: KASKY v. NIKE, INC., 79 Cal. App. 4th 165, 93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 854 (Cal.App. Dist.1 2000), rev'd/remanded, 27 Cal. 4th 939, 45 P. 3d 243, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 296 (2002), writ of cert. dismissed as improvidently granted sub nom Kasky v. Nike, Inc., 539 U.S. 654, 123 S....

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary ...

... an integral part of the family residence.  Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12.  See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary ...

... as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App. 1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an ...