In article <48d81069$0$8522$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>, T3 <notme@nowhere.net> wrote: http://roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=34316 Heh, actually there was! FIRST PERSON/OPINION By John Ulrich The idea of an alternative series in racing is nothing new. No offense, Tom, but could you refrain from posting entire articles, please? A short quote

Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=34272 "Roadracing World is an enemy publication." So MIC calling RRW "an enemy publication" is proof that RRW has a vendetta against the MIC? "Proof"? No, but pretty good evidence, I think - why would MIC think RRW is "an enemy

Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: Right, because you're pretty sure Johnny U won't end his vendetta against the OEMs and USSB and his blatant support for DMG any time soon. Ulrich and his magazine do to a degree rely on the good will of the OEMs - he had a vendetta against them, he likely wouldn't get bikes

Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: Howard Kveck wrote: Mark N wrote: Right, because you're pretty sure Johnny U won't end his vendetta against the OEMs and USSB and his blatant support for DMG any time soon. >> Ulrich and his magazine do to a degree rely on the good will of the OEMs - they want their bikes seen and favorably reviewed in as many magazines

On 2008-09-16 15:24:16 -0400, Bruce <doNOTmailMe@example.com> said: T3 wrote: On 2008-09-10 02:28:50 -0400, Julian Bond <julian_bond@voidstar.com> said: T3 <notme@nowhere.net> Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:54:56 On 2008-09-09 17:38:03 -0400, Julian Bond <julian_bond@voidstar.com> said: One of those tricky questions. Are Suzuki racing a 2006 GSXR1000 or a 2008? Or