Rinkk
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 2 articles for 0.302 sec
"thufir" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> stated in post cQOkk.109159$kx.27244@pd7urf3no on 8/1/08 6:34 PM: > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:44:30 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>> With great hesitation I'll agree, though, with the caveat that I really >>> can't see where .doc would really be a legitimate requirement (outside >>> of a class on word itself). >> >> Your view of the legitimacy is irrelevant. >     

Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy · Group Profile · Search for Rinkk in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Author: Snit
Date: Aug 1, 2008 18:45

"thufir" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> stated in post RINkk.109101$kx.91699@pd7urf3no on 8/1/08 5:17 PM: On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:28:54 -0700, Snit wrote: From what I have shown the risk might not be that small. Depends on the class, though, and the required formatting, I suppose. If I were to adopt your tactics I'd accuse you of waffling. That might be your perception
Show full article (3.95Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy · Group Profile · Search for Rinkk in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Author: Snit
Date: Aug 1, 2008 17:44

Show full article (3.07Kb) · Show article thread