.... Of course he was child of his time, but if we take that in account he was for the most part very modern compared with his contemporaries However he was a theist, and believed that righteoussness would always be sanctified by his diety. Like many Christians after him, he rejected the possibility that his "father" would ever support anything that was evil in the eyes of the believer. As ...

... Jerusalem was in the name of killing evil people, was that a good result? Do you consider President Ahmadinejad's claim of no homosexuals in Iran a good result? Nope. It wasn't righteoussness that caused those problems. It was lies. Bad people talking about good. When the good talk about good, good things happen. When the bad talk about good, bad things happen. ...

... Jerusalem was in the name of killing evil people, was that a good result? Do you consider President Ahmadinejad's claim of no homosexuals in Iran a good result? Nope. It wasn't righteoussness that caused those problems. It was lies. Bad people talking about good. When the good talk about good, good things happen. When the bad talk about good, bad things happen. ...