Search result for Ridicuous http://www.nnseek.com/Ridicuous_s.html Search results for Ridicuous Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:01:34 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek <![CDATA[Re: The psychology of pattern recognition]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/the_psychology_of_pattern_recognition_183432448m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/the_psychology_of_pattern_recognition_183432448m.html ridicualize. It's one of the things that keeps us tuned, this pittyfull individual creature called man.

  Posted In: alt.philosophy   no comments   Reply
]]> Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:01:34 PDT <![CDATA[Re: What's much more effective in warfare - a navy battleship, a bomber, or a submarine?]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.nuke.the.usa/what_s_much_more_effective_in_warfare_a_navy_battleship_104166656m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.nuke.the.usa/what_s_much_more_effective_in_warfare_a_navy_battleship_104166656m.html >:>lose wars. :>> :>>Serving tea in the Admiral's stateroom hardly counts, Gnu..... :) :> :>Serving the best tea and scones in the fleet never did HMS Hood any harm. :> :>What's that, you say, Lieutenant -- the Bismark? Don't be ridicu-- :> " Not funny McGee! " -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  Posted In: alt.nuke.the.usa   no comments   Reply
]]> Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:18:05 PST <![CDATA[Re: What's much more effective in warfare - a navy battleship, a bomber, or a submarine?]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.nuke.the.usa/what_s_much_more_effective_in_warfare_a_navy_battleship_103822080m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.nuke.the.usa/what_s_much_more_effective_in_warfare_a_navy_battleship_103822080m.html The most effective weapon in warfare is the British, because they rarely :>lose wars. Serving tea in the Admiral's stateroom hardly counts, Gnu..... :) Serving the best tea and scones in the fleet never did HMS Hood any harm. What's that, you say, Lieutenant -- the Bismark? Don't be ridicu--

  Posted In: alt.nuke.the.usa   no comments   Reply
]]> Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:31:55 PST <![CDATA[Re: Sherlock Holmes: Is It Deduction Or Induction?]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/sherlock_holmes_is_it_deduction_or_induction_37305344m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/sherlock_holmes_is_it_deduction_or_induction_37305344m.html ridicu- lously simple that I could easily do it myself, though at each successive instance of your reasoning I am baffled until you explain your process. And yet I believe that my eyes are as good as ...

  Posted In: alt.philosophy   no comments   Reply
]]> Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:34:38 PDT