...>Doug Hoffman <dhoffman@talkamerica.net> writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] "The most-accurate, least-expensive documentation is self-documenting code." : RECT { x1 ... " y2 . do-point2 ; Your point is probably that LOCALS| y2 x2 y1 x1 | is equivalent to LOCALS| y2 x2 | LOCALS| y1 x1 | and that { x1 y1 x2 y2 } is *not...
...> writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) On Aug 28, 9:20 pm, m...@iae.nl...>> comments easily. And if the syntax replaces the now standard stack ... unambiguously. Mixing stack comment and locals make no sense to me. ... cells ] BUF2 } to declare 2 local buffers. What does this have ... ever mix stack comments and locals either. Your example : foo { | [ 1024 ...
...> writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] This will get...excluding the two files that define locals). Data, good! Some updated data from...Number of occurences of '{' as likely locals definition: grep '{ ' *.fs */*.fs |grep ... general, this brings back the LOCALS| nightmare. It only works with ... that implements double and FP locals the way that Bruce McFarling ...
...writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] This will...the two files that define locals). There seem to be no...details of the existing standard locals (1305 uses) are not that...no requests to implement the "{" syntax natively. In fact, I never...see any support questions wrt locals at all. Doubles are on...general, this brings back the LOCALS| nightmare. It only works with...
....nl (Marcel Hendrix) writes: Bruce McFarling <agila61@netscape.net> writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] This will get confusing if... } In general, this brings back the LOCALS| nightmare. It only works with separate FP locals definitions because they are on a separate stack (and it does not work for FP locals if they are on a shared stack)....
Bruce McFarling <agila61@netscape.net> writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] This will get confusing if used with arrays ... better to make it a specialization of the generic "d:", "f:"? ... { nb d: quack -- u } ( F: -- r ) 0e 0e 0e 0e {f: t0 t1 t2 t3 -- r } 0+1i 1+0i {f: z: a z: c } or, even simpler: ... { s: nb -- ...
...: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] I would write it like this: : maeno() { nb d: ud -- u r } ... ( I ...f: r } ) One can write it like this to keep consistency with the locals definition part, but I would probably leave the additional "f:" away, because the "...
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) [..] I would write it like this: : maeno() { nb d: ud -- u r } 0e 0e 0e 0e 0e 0e 0e 0e { f: t3 f: t2 f: t1 f: t0 } 0+1i 1+0i { z: c z: a } [..] OK, not too bad. ( I guess you meant : maeno() { nb d: ud ...
... writes Re: RfD - Enhancedlocalvariablesyntax, v4 (long) A question from this thread's start: [..] Local types and extensions -------------------------- Some current ... systems use indicators to define local values of sizes other than ... u ) ( F: -- r ) DLOCAL quack LOCAL nb 0e 0e 0e 0e ... and not QUACK. 3) The locals definitions of NB and UD...
