... Yes, that's right, exactly like he is today. Note that he accepts that he is Doug Bollen, and it's the par@noid.demon.co.uk address and look at the sig, yes, that's right I do like the line "Doug my little flower-pot man, you're cracking me up now. " Time to resurect(sp) it, maybe? "Blob-a-blob" ..... *much* more sense than any of Duhgs posts.... -- Ian
... a big surprise. I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. What a surprisingly foolish post! Why? Fortran was a great language for maths ...
... a big surprise. I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. What a surprisingly foolish post! Why? Fortran was a great language ...
... a big surprise. I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. What a surprisingly foolish post! Why? Fortran was a great language for maths there ...
kronecker@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Gosh, this was a big surprise. I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. What a surprisingly foolish post!
.... I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Interpreted languages like Matlab have many uses, but in many cases they aren't fast enough. Labview has completely different uses. Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers ...
.... I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Interpreted languages like Matlab have many uses, but in many cases they aren't fast enough. Labview has completely different uses. Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's ...
... I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Interpreted languages like Matlab have many uses, but in many cases they aren't fast enough. Labview has completely different uses. Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers...
kronecker@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Gosh, this was a big surprise. I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. It does what I want. Is reason enough.
.... I though Fortran was dead as a Dodo! Why are people still using it? I was a great fan of it until about 1997 when I moved to Matlab...then LabView. Why the need to resurect Fortran? Yes, I know C is shite, has no complex numbers etc but that's not an excuse. K. Resurrect? Riggggghhhhhttttttttt....... Nice trolling attempt. Well, actually, it was a rather lame ...
