...not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? Because containerisation has made it obsolete. Why carry a whole vehicle when you can simply detach the box...
...'s not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? One train can take a significant number of lorry trailers (no tractor unit needed thus no drivers) with one driver. It ...
...'s not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? Because containerisation has made it obsolete. Why carry a whole vehicle when you can simply detach the box that ...
...It's not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? One train can take a significant number of lorry trailers (no tractor unit needed thus no drivers) with one driver. It works...
...'s not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? Because containerisation has made it obsolete. Why carry a whole vehicle when you can simply detach the box that contains ...
...>>> It's not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? One train can take a significant number of lorry trailers (no tractor unit needed thus no drivers) with one driver. It ...
...s not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? Because containerisation has made it obsolete. Why carry a whole vehicle when you can simply detach the box that contains the cargo and...
.... It's not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? One train can take a significant number of lorry trailers (no tractor unit needed thus no drivers) with one driver. It works ...
...It's not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. How so? One train can take a significant number of lorry trailers (no tractor unit needed thus no drivers) with one driver. It works elsewhere in...
... that one. It's not 1895 any more. No-one can seriously expect land-travel to be achieved by means of loading motor-vehicles onto trains as though they were bikes. What a *colossal* waste of resurces, time, manpower and management that would be. I agree (FWIW) that the M25 is not an adequate "hub" for southern England's main routes and that there should be other routes (much ...
