Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org> writes: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 20:12 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@ens-lyon.org> writes: In order to get a backtrace from the segfault, you need to run gdb on an X server with debugging symbols enabled, which will then give a much more informative backtrace. The problem here is I don't know how
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:32:51 +0100, "CJM" <cjmnews@removeme-yahoo.co.uk> wrote: "Tim O" <timo56@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message news:i4ae14pldqfad0c7hb5s8bu73a3b0n0raa@4ax.com... On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:57:28 GMT, Spalls Hurgenson <yoinks@ebalu.com> wrote: Ah, month's end. That time when the boss dumps a crap-load of extra work on the desk, that time when all the bills
Werner Spahl wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Rob wrote: We've been here before haven't we? Yeah, but the cool movie reviews linked from here show that more and more people are thinking the same, and the reviewers don't care nevertheless. Did STALKER really not deliver what you were "promised"? Or is it really a case of it didn't turn out how you expected it to? Were
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@ens-lyon.org> writes: Hi Otavio, the core file you sent is not really usable as Xorg catches the SIGSEGV, so the core file is only showing an abort. In order to get a backtrace from the segfault, you need to run gdb on an X server with debugging symbols enabled, which will then give a much more informative backtrace. The problem here is I don't
