Religioon
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 13 articles for 0.303 sec
Hello, Didi, I think your English is understandable, which is the important thing about language. It is to communicate with. The more you use it, the more you learn of the structure actually used by the people. Even that will vary by region and dialect. I did not intend to start a conversation about race and religion. I meant only to point out that the early Europeans in America soon     

Group: alt.fiftyplus.friends · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in alt.fiftyplus.friends
Author: DittyDumDumDidy
Date: Jul 16, 2008 05:16

On Jun 2, 4:04 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote: rick_so...@hotmail.com wrote: If you compare religion to modern science, you will find some differences in the way that people approach the same problem. The search for truth. [snip crap] hey stooopid:  Science is a predictive, falsifiable mathetmatical model of empirical observation.  "Truth" has nothing
Show full article (0.86Kb) · Show article thread
On Jun 2, 4:04 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote: > rick_so...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > If you compare religion to modern science, you will find some > > differences in the way that people approach the same problem. The > > search for truth. > > [snip crap] > > hey stooopid:  Science is a predictive, falsifiable mathetmatical > model of empirical observation.  "Truth" has nothing     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Jun 1, 2008 23:26

On Jun 2, 4:04 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote: rick_so...@hotmail.com wrote: If you compare religion to modern science, you will find some differences in the way that people approach the same problem. The search for truth. [snip crap] hey stooopid:  Science is a predictive, falsifiable mathetmatical model of empirical observation.  "Truth" has nothing
Show full article (2.86Kb)
On Mar 29, 6:23 pm, "Ivannof" <ivan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > "Maz Spork" <m...@spork.dk> skrev i en meddelelsenews:d11f943b-fd93-4ae4-a4b3-6bae0ceb10ae@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 28, 3:25 pm, "/Peter" <nos...@no.mail> wrote: > > > > > "Maz Spork" <m...@spork.dk> skrev i en > > meddelelsenews:9199f0a8-8045-4d47-8520-a3ffc0322a5b@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > At danskere kan     

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in sci.physics.particle
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Jun 1, 2008 23:26

"Maz Spork" <maz@spork.dk> skrev i en meddelelse news:d11f943b-fd93-4ae4-a4b3-6bae0ceb10ae@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Mar 28, 3:25 pm, "/Peter" <nos...@no.mail> wrote: "Maz Spork" <m...@spork.dk> skrev i en meddelelsenews:9199f0a8-8045-4d47-8520-a3ffc0322a5b@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... At danskere kan få sig selv til at ville udvise, forfølge eller slå andre mennesker ihjel
Show full article (2.86Kb)
On Mar 28, 3:25 pm, "/Peter" <nos...@no.mail> wrote: > "Maz Spork" <m...@spork.dk> skrev i en meddelelsenews:9199f0a8-8045-4d47-8520-a3ffc0322a5b@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > At danskere kan få sig selv til at ville udvise, forfølge eller slå > andre mennesker ihjel på grund af deres tro? Man føler sig hensat til > en helt anden tid. > > Ingen bryder sig om religiøs fanatisme. Personligt bryder     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in sci.physics
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Jun 1, 2008 23:26

"Maz Spork" <maz@spork.dk> skrev i en meddelelse news:9199f0a8-8045-4d47-8520-a3ffc0322a5b@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... At danskere kan få sig selv til at ville udvise, forfølge eller slå andre mennesker ihjel på grund af deres tro? Man føler sig hensat til en helt anden tid. Ingen bryder sig om religiøs fanatisme. Personligt bryder jeg mig slet ikke om religion, jeg synes det er synd for
Show full article (2.86Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 5, 6:56 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Aug 4, 11:23 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > in case you ddint know > > our universe is 15 billions years old > > not more and not 100 billion years > > We always seem to go in circles with you. So now we have > to cycle back through another discussion that we've already > had. > > Why do you think the age     

Group: dk.politik · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in dk.politik
Author: Maz Spork
Date: Mar 30, 2008 04:31

On Aug 5, 6:56 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 4, 11:23 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: in case you ddint know our universe is 15 billions years old not more and not 100 billion years We always seem to go in circles with you. So now we have to cycle back through another discussion that we've already had. Why do you think the age
Show full article (5.64Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: dk.politik · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in dk.politik
Author: Ivannof
Date: Mar 29, 2008 09:23

Show full article (4.16Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: dk.politik · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in dk.politik
Author: Maz Spork
Date: Mar 29, 2008 04:25

Show full article (2.52Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: dk.politik · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in dk.politik
Author: /Peter
Date: Mar 28, 2008 07:25

Show full article (1.57Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 7, 2007 05:18

Show full article (3.30Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Religioon in sci.physics.particle
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 7, 2007 05:18

Show full article (3.30Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next