Relicensed
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 732 articles for 0.312 sec
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:06 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote: > > Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's > > content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license > > that apply to the R.N ? > > We are currently asking all contributors to agree to GPL2 > (unfortunately without the famous "or later" a     

Group: linux.debian.doc · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.doc
Author: Franklin PIAT
Date: Sep 3, 2008 14:00

On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:06 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote: Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license that apply to the R.N ? We are currently asking all contributors to agree to GPL2 (unfortunately without the famous "or later" a
Show full article (1.04Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:03:57PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > However, the author of the icons has indicated he'd be willing to > relicense them, within the constraints of the original work, of > course. Now, CC-SA 2.5 section 4.b says > > You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly > digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this     

Group: linux.debian.devel · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.devel
Author: Franklin PIAT
Date: Sep 3, 2008 14:00

Package: tolua Version: 5.1b-1 Severity: important Hi, the license of tolua isn't DFSG-compliant, which caused the REJECT of boswars (which includes a modified copy of tolua++, under the same terms as tolua) — I didn't look into that license too much at that time, since the very same terms were used for a package in main. Fortunately, both tolua & tolua++ authors agreed to relicense their
Show full article (1.04Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:03:57 -0600 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > [Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list.] Done. > > Recent developement versions of liferea include a set of icons derived > from the CC-SA 2.5 tango icons set. > > That means I can't upload such versions to main, as that's not > DFSG-free. I agree. > > However, the author of the icons has     

Group: linux.debian.legal · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.legal
Author: John Halton
Date: Mar 24, 2008 12:40

[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list.] Recent developement versions of liferea include a set of icons derived from the CC-SA 2.5 tango icons set. That means I can't upload such versions to main, as that's not DFSG-free. However, the author of the icons has indicated he'd be willing to relicense them, within the constraints of the original work, of course. Now, CC-SA
Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:16 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > forcemerge 435691 378594 > thank you > > > > > Nathan A. Stine wrote: > > The folks that develop GATOS have agreed to relicense their software > > under the MIT license[1]. This means that upstream will likely merge > > this code into mainline Xorg. > > > > A patch[2] already exists for 6.6.3. Another for 6.6.191[3], which     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Cyril Brulebois
Date: Mar 22, 2008 18:30

forcemerge 435691 378594 thank you Nathan A. Stine wrote: The folks that develop GATOS have agreed to relicense their software under the MIT license[1]. This means that upstream will likely merge this code into mainline Xorg. A patch[2] already exists for 6.6.3. Another for 6.6.191[3], which should be adaptable to 6.6.192, the current version in experimental.
Show full article (0.71Kb)
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati Version: 1:6.6.3-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The folks that develop GATOS have agreed to relicense their software under the MIT license[1]. This means that upstream will likely merge this code into mainline Xorg. A patch[2] already exists for 6.6.3. Another for 6.6.191[3], which should be adaptable to 6.6.192, the current version in experimental     

Group: linux.debian.legal · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.legal
Author: Francesco Poli
Date: Mar 22, 2008 13:40

Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati Version: 1:6.6.3-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The folks that develop GATOS have agreed to relicense their software under the MIT license[1]. This means that upstream will likely merge this code into mainline Xorg. A patch[2] already exists for 6.6.3. Another for 6.6.191[3], which should be adaptable to 6.6.192, the current version in experimental
Show full article (1.66Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.legal · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.legal
Author: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
Date: Mar 21, 2008 15:00

Show full article (1.13Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Nathan A. Stine
Date: Aug 2, 2007 11:30

Show full article (1.58Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Brice Goglin
Date: Aug 2, 2007 10:30

Show full article (1.29Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Nathan A. Stine
Date: Aug 2, 2007 10:00

Show full article (1.47Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Relicensed in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Nathan A. Stine
Date: Aug 2, 2007 09:50

Show full article (1.47Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next