...> WRONG, since Hammond has showed that the eigenvectors are CAUSALLY related to the 4 spacetime dimensions via the cartesian cleavage of the body, and thus the 4x4 eigenvector matrix is RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. Relativistic Curvature, I would rmind you, is a PHYSICS subject. Psycho - talking in the third person again. I guess "The Ward" doesn't have a medication for that. All ...
...Hammond] WRONG, since Hammond has showed that the eigenvectors are CAUSALLY related to the 4 spacetime dimensions via the cartesian cleavage of the body, and thus the 4x4 eigenvector matrix is RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. Relativistic Curvature, I would rmind you, is a PHYSICS subject. What I've discovered is what CAUSES THE EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE, and that is a PHYSICS problem...
...the full thread can only be viewed in sci.physics.relativity.) 400 posts is near a record in the Physics newsgroups. The explanation for this is that the title of the thread: RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRONCIPLE immediately suggests to the (scientific) reader, that YES a scientific proof of God has been found! To a scientist, the title has immediate face validity! Meanwhile, the...
... (Michael Moroney) wrote: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org> writes: 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. Nope, it's your ...delusions. UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION LACKING ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE That's correct. Your "Relativistic Anthropic Principle" is nothing more than UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS LACKING ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE. ...
... and discuss physics. You can help by taking your proof-of-God hallucinations someplace more appropiate, perhaps alt.stupidity, or better yet, the nearest dumpster. 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. [Michael Moroney] Nope, it's your unsupported rantings and delusions. [Hammond] UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION LACKING ANY ...
...doug\"@(none)"> wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:52 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: [Hammond] 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. No, it is a religious tract which is in conflict with physics and history. The world did not ...
...read about and discuss physics. You can help by taking your proof-of-God hallucinations someplace more appropiate, perhaps alt.stupidity, or better yet, the nearest dumpster. 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. Nope, it's your unsupported rantings and delusions. For it to be physics (or any science) you have to follow the Scientific ...
...03 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:52 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: [Hammond] 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. No, it is a religious tract which is in conflict with physics and history. The world did not start ...
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:52 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: [Hammond] 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. No, it is a religious tract which is in conflict with physics and history. The world did not start when man was "created". That is false as is the rest of what you said. [Hammond]...
... and discuss physics. You can help by taking your proof-of-God hallucinations someplace more appropiate, perhaps alt.stupidity, or better yet, the nearest dumpster. [Hammond] 1. The "Relativistic Anthropi9c Principle" is manifestly a Physics Subject. 2. I'm a graduate physicist. Hence, I'm not going anywhere. I suggest you quit posting off topic, ad hominem ...
