Reecy
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 2 articles for 0.302 sec
On Sep 5, 8:22 am, "Vito" <v...@xxcrosslink.net> wrote: > "BrianNZ" <br...@itnz.co.nz> wrote > > > I'll go for the ....... yes, you still have significant traction at the > > rear, enough to make a difference.....if it stops me 1 metre short of a > > cliff, vs going a further 1.5 metres it would be a huge difference. > > Hauling on the front too hard invites losing the front end. My bike feels     

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Reecy in rec.motorcycles
Author: S'mee
Date: Sep 5, 2008 10:30

"BrianNZ" <brian@itnz.co.nz> wrote I'll go for the ....... yes, you still have significant traction at the rear, enough to make a difference.....if it stops me 1 metre short of a cliff, vs going a further 1.5 metres it would be a huge difference. Hauling on the front too hard invites losing the front end. My bike feels more stable with both brakes. To avoid the rear tyre lifting
Show full article (1.87Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Reecy in rec.motorcycles
Author: Vito
Date: Sep 5, 2008 07:22

Show full article (1.41Kb) · Show article thread