OM wrote: On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:23:27 GMT, simberg.interglobal@org.trash (Rand Simberg) wrote: Yes. Just your stupid opinion. ...Rand? Could you just killfile this troll, or do we need to go through another peer vote? Exception should be taken in this case, you must agree. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io

Wow dale, henry, neil, pat, scott, and greg, oh yeah I cant forget about george, now that the goon roll call has been taken, and all you close buddies seem be here and acting as a usenet trolling group. And I guess your school yard mentality has not changed but never the less you all are acting like a clan of trolls, as anybody can see your on topic stuff when you care to sound intellectual,

Henry Spencer wrote: In article <C1935A9D.8726%%georgee3@earthlink.net>, George Evans <georgee3@earthlink.net> wrote: Amen. These European socialists make me laugh. They never have quite grasped the concept of "private". As opposed to American socialists, who understand the concept but don't think it has any relevance to spaceflight? Not the right thread try trolling

Danny Dot wrote:"My experience at NASA is management will "roast" an engineer that attempts to allert them to a bad management decision that might be unsafe.Danny Dot" The purpose of establishing the independent technical authority within nasa is so that "All programs should have the benefit of an independent engineering authority to ensure that technical standards are being met" according

Danny Dot wrote:" After reading the posts to this thread, maybe something different with NASA is the time frame for a bad management decision to result in the catastrophe. At NASA it may be just a few hours. The dissenting engineer at NASA doesn't have time to get his fellow engineers and low level managers on his side and let the decision makers realize what his happening. Time from discovery