Recomneded
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 15 articles for 0.132 sec
Which OS is the Terminal Server running? What is the exact error message that normal users get when they try to log on? Is the TS a member server in the domain, or is it running on a Domain Controller? Assuming that the TS runs 2003, have you made sure that the users are member of the *local* Remote Desktop Users group on the TS? Also make sure that the "Allow logon to Terminal Server" checkbox     

Group: microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services
Author: Vera Noest [MVP]
Date: Nov 26, 2007 13:04

OM wrote: On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:23:27 GMT, simberg.interglobal@org.trash (Rand Simberg) wrote: Yes. Just your stupid opinion. ...Rand? Could you just killfile this troll, or do we need to go through another peer vote? Exception should be taken in this case, you must agree. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io
Show full article (2.49Kb) · Show article thread
Pat Flannery wrote: > Alan Jones wrote: > > > > >One of the saddest examples of private investment and development was > >the case of the Northrop F-20. The investment, economic development, > >etc., was laudable, but the US government said essentially, "Very > >nice, but it is not quite good enough for us to buy, and too good for > >us to allow you to build and sell them to anyone else     

Group: sci.space.history · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.history
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Dec 2, 2006 13:18

Wow dale, henry, neil, pat, scott, and greg, oh yeah I cant forget about george, now that the goon roll call has been taken, and all you close buddies seem be here and acting as a usenet trolling group. And I guess your school yard mentality has not changed but never the less you all are acting like a clan of trolls, as anybody can see your on topic stuff when you care to sound intellectual,
Show full article (6.48Kb) · Show article thread
Henry Spencer wrote: > In article <C1935A9D.8726%%georgee3@earthlink.net>, > George Evans <georgee3@earthlink.net> wrote: > >Amen. These European socialists make me laugh. They never have quite grasped > >the concept of "private". > > As opposed to American socialists, who understand the concept but don't > think it has any relevance to spaceflight? Not the right thread try trolling     

Group: sci.space.history · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.history
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Dec 1, 2006 17:49

Henry Spencer wrote: In article <C1935A9D.8726%%georgee3@earthlink.net>, George Evans <georgee3@earthlink.net> wrote: Amen. These European socialists make me laugh. They never have quite grasped the concept of "private". As opposed to American socialists, who understand the concept but don't think it has any relevance to spaceflight? Not the right thread try trolling
Show full article (8.07Kb)
Henry Spencer wrote: > In article <C1935A9D.8726%%georgee3@earthlink.net>, > George Evans <georgee3@earthlink.net> wrote: > >Amen. These European socialists make me laugh. They never have quite grasped > >the concept of "private". > > As opposed to American socialists, who understand the concept but don't > think it has any relevance to spaceflight? Not the right thread try trolling     

Group: sci.space.history · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.history
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 30, 2006 06:20

Danny Dot wrote:"My experience at NASA is management will "roast" an engineer that attempts to allert them to a bad management decision that might be unsafe.Danny Dot" The purpose of establishing the independent technical authority within nasa is so that "All programs should have the benefit of an independent engineering authority to ensure that technical standards are being met" according
Show full article (3.48Kb)
Danny Dot wrote:"My experience at NASA is management will "roast" an engineer that attempts to allert them to a bad management decision that might be unsafe.Danny Dot" The purpose of establishing the independent technical authority within nasa is so that "All programs should have the benefit of an independent engineering authority to ensure that technical standards are being met" according     

Group: sci.space.history · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.history
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 30, 2006 06:05

Danny Dot wrote:" After reading the posts to this thread, maybe something different with NASA is the time frame for a bad management decision to result in the catastrophe. At NASA it may be just a few hours. The dissenting engineer at NASA doesn't have time to get his fellow engineers and low level managers on his side and let the decision makers realize what his happening. Time from discovery
Show full article (3.31Kb)
    

Group: sci.space.shuttle · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.shuttle
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 30, 2006 06:05

Show full article (3.31Kb)
    

Group: sci.space.policy · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.policy
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 30, 2006 06:05

Show full article (3.31Kb)
    

Group: sci.space.history · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.history
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 26, 2006 14:09

Show full article (1.96Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.space.shuttle · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.shuttle
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 26, 2006 14:09

Show full article (1.96Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.space.shuttle · Group Profile · Search for Recomneded in sci.space.shuttle
Author: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Date: Nov 26, 2006 14:08

Show full article (2.28Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next