On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:06:44 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote: Barack Hussein Bohica wrote: On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:31 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote: Our guy got him. ...using ~our~ guy's methods. Why then didn't your guy use your guy's methods to get him? Rather than leaving it to our guy to do so? Must really irritate
"Bill Shatzer" <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message news:ipv71m$oko$1@dont-email.me... Barack Hussein Bohica wrote: On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:31 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote: Our guy got him. ...using ~our~ guy's methods. Why then didn't your guy use your guy's methods to get him? Rather than leaving it to our guy to do so? Must
Bill Shatzer wrote: Barack Hussein Bohica wrote: On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:31 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote: Our guy got him. ...using ~our~ guy's methods. Why then didn't your guy use your guy's methods to get him? because the intel had not led that far then, duh... Rather than leaving it to our guy to do so? he link was not yet there
Barack Hussein Bohica wrote: On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:31 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38@NOcornell.edu> wrote: Our guy got him. ...using ~our~ guy's methods. Why then didn't your guy use your guy's methods to get him? Rather than leaving it to our guy to do so? Must really irritate your moonbat hemorrhoids ... What REALLY pricks your butt is that our guy got him and your
On Jun 8, 10:29 am, ben6993 <ben6...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Jun 8, 8:11 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jun 8, 6:30 am, "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote: "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5f893080-52ff-4878-b1bf-a2da669c9380@e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... On Jun 7, 5:49 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...@rest.com> wrote
