Canadian woman gives birth to extremely rare identical quadruplets. __">
Ramonster
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 38 articles for 0.303 sec
Doug wrote: > Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're > all going back to Canada. Do you seriously believe a > Canadian would WANT to live in the US? Well, they may if they need medical care... > > The crossposting give you away every time Ramonster! > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > news:5iph7oF3r1q1fU1@mid.individual.net... > > Mrs Jepp     

Group: la.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in la.general
Author: SlackJaw
Date: Aug 25, 2007 09:24

Doug wrote: Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're all going back to Canada. Do you seriously believe a Canadian would WANT to live in the US? Well, they may if they need medical care... The crossposting give you away every time Ramonster! "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message news:5iph7oF3r1q1fU1@mid.individual.net... Mrs Jepp
Show full article (0.95Kb) · Show article thread
Doug wrote: > Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're > all going back to Canada. Do you seriously believe a > Canadian would WANT to live in the US? Well, they may if they need medical care... > > The crossposting give you away every time Ramonster! > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > news:5iph7oF3r1q1fU1@mid.individual.net... > > Mrs Jepp     

Group: tx.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in tx.general
Author: SlackJaw
Date: Aug 25, 2007 09:24

strabo wrote: _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: strabo wrote: ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: Doug wrote: Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a Canadian would WANT to live in the US? No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens by birthright. There is no automatic birthright
Show full article (0.95Kb) · Show article thread
strabo wrote: > _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: >> strabo wrote: >>> ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: >>>> Doug wrote: >>>>> Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're >>>>> all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a >>>>> Canadian would WANT to live in the US? >>>> No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens >>>> by birthright. >>>> >>> There is no automatic birthright     

Group: az.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in az.general
Author: SlackJaw
Date: Aug 25, 2007 09:24

strabo wrote: _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: strabo wrote: ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: Doug wrote: Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a Canadian would WANT to live in the US? No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens by birthright. There is no automatic birthright
Show full article (0.95Kb) · Show article thread
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: > strabo wrote: >> ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: >>> Doug wrote: >>>> Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're >>>> all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a >>>> Canadian would WANT to live in the US? >>> No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens >>> by birthright. >>> >> There is no automatic birthright for legal foreign     

Group: la.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in la.general
Author: George Grapman
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:43

_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: strabo wrote: ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: Doug wrote: Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a Canadian would WANT to live in the US? No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens by birthright. There is no automatic birthright for legal foreign
Show full article (2.63Kb) · Show article thread
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: > strabo wrote: >> ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: >>> Doug wrote: >>>> Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're >>>> all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a >>>> Canadian would WANT to live in the US? >>> No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens >>> by birthright. >>> >> There is no automatic birthright for legal foreign     

Group: tx.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in tx.general
Author: George Grapman
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:43

¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: Doug wrote: Duh, they're not anchor babies Ramon, because they're all going back to Canada. Do you *seriously* believe a Canadian would WANT to live in the US? No sane Canadian, however the Babies, all 4 of them, ARE U$ citizens by birthright. There is no automatic birthright for legal foreign nationals. They were admitted to the US as Canadian
Show full article (2.63Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: az.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in az.general
Author: George Grapman
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:43

Show full article (2.63Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: la.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in la.general
Author: strabo
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:23

Show full article (2.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: tx.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in tx.general
Author: strabo
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:23

Show full article (2.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: az.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in az.general
Author: strabo
Date: Aug 21, 2007 14:23

Show full article (2.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: la.general · Group Profile · Search for Ramonster in la.general
Author: strabo
Date: Aug 21, 2007 04:39

Show full article (1.51Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · next