R504
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 3 articles for 0.000 sec
Re: Fortran 2003 questions     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for R504 in comp.lang.fortran
Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 25, 2008 08:51

...all compilers I tried reject it. The following related is however definitely invalid EXTERNAL func REAL :: func(2) as F95 and F2003 [5.1 Type declaration statements] contains: R504 entity-decl is object-name [( array-spec )] [ * char-length ] [ initialization ] or function-name [ * char-length ] Are we reading the standard correctly? ...
Show full article (1.61Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Fortran 2003 questions     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for R504 in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: May 25, 2008 02:03

..., even though all compilers I tried reject it. The following related is however definitely invalid EXTERNAL func REAL :: func(2) as F95 and F2003 [5.1 Type declaration statements] contains: R504 entity-decl is object-name [( array-spec )] [ * char-length ] [ initialization ] or function-name [ * char-length ] Are we reading the standard correctly? Or ...
Show full article (0.93Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Type specification and initialization expressions     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for R504 in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Steve Lionel
Date: Jan 31, 2008 13:23

...and therefore is `prior' by the time the <initialization> is encountered,'' and accept this. Others reason ``the `specification' of P is the syntax term <entity- defined by syntax rule R504 on page 47, which includes the <initialization>, and it is therefore not `prior' until the <initialization> is completely specified,'' and do not accept this. By way of further examples, which ...
Show full article (5.96Kb)