Qdot
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 13 articles for 0.303 sec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Post-Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 05:03:00 +0000 Info: Copy of spam reported via SpamCop.Net Info: Country info based on zz.countries.nerd.dk Info: ASN info based on asn.routeviews.org SPAMCOP.net-REPORT: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1942172729z0010d4c3da0351cfe81719df82ccb5e1z Spam-Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 03:38:54 +0000 (1212210180) Spam-Track: IP     

Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: May 30, 2008 22:03

I have a code that I am using to display a matrix for heat transfer, but I keep getting the error ??? Attempted to access A(1,-4); index must be a positive integer or logical. I have tried several things, but I am all out of ideas. I am an intermediate Matlab user. Any help would be great. Here is my code: L = input('Enter the length '); H = input('Enter the height '); XG = input
Show full article (3.99Kb)
Martin Ouwehand schrieb: > Dans l'article <47D6BBAD.5050807@univie.ac.at>, > Arnold Neumaier <Arnold.Neumaier@univie.ac.at> écrit: > > ] If you have friction, the problem is no longer conservative, and the > ] standard Lagrangian or Hamiltonian approach is no longer applicable. > > however, some differential equations describing systems with friction > may be derived from a Lagrangian:     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: Patrick King
Date: Mar 31, 2008 16:19

Pmb schrieb: "Arnold Neumaier" <Arnold.Neumaier@univie.ac.at> wrote in message news:47D6BBAD.5050807@univie.ac.at... Pmb schrieb: I was wondering if anyone knows of systems for which the Hamiltonian is not equal to the total energy? This is the case in any diffeomorphism invariant theory; ... I don't understand. Since a "diffeomorphism" is a map between manifolds
Show full article (4.13Kb)
=ybegin part=2 line=128 size=275229 name=misha2-096.jpg =ypart begin=249601 end=275229 0œØÓ÷•€g[¶•½Cr:xTD˜ÇÒ_è×7_|ùxu£Ex°p“Œ{ìj°çœ¥ŒR¼}¡H<b¾™Ä©V£œgL…r…‚ÿ̸XíUänò›Ï’ÿCJ+Ž.Ž–Î_Áæôa½ÈìOFÁÁӚæº*3×~ 쒖û¼š e®WÐÁדÝïŸÂC§¯¼rllcgC‚´¹45b.1Ӂø$½¤ˆŽüÁ|$î7V<nž®ÈLzöê,9˜âN-ˆ†[»u®ÍÖ)*p‰A/®àà œî†òóöoX)*5œÍ[ cHNð>2VõzñÁ&滣io•ç ‡óߓÃͲ8-=M5÷±Ph¢Ÿ»ûõKQVf‰÷Ü#íö¡|”dßpËÔ[[UJ´U•œeÀ     

Group: sci.physics.research · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.physics.research
Author: Arnold Neumaier
Date: Mar 14, 2008 13:20

Dave Schaack wrote: "Farsang" <youzpalang@netscape.net> wrote in message news:1180623982.886736.10690@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... 2-Your argument about NA comes from " h1 x NA1 = h2 x NA2 ", the optical invariant, where h1 and h2 are object and image sizes, respectively. Isn't this equation valid only for paraxial case (i.e. NAs defined by sines of half angles) and
Show full article (3.08Kb) · Show article thread
Dave Schaack wrote: > "Farsang" <youzpalang@netscape.net> wrote in message > news:1180623982.886736.10690@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > >> 2-Your argument about NA comes from " h1 x NA1 = h2 x NA2 ", the >> optical invariant, where h1 and h2 are object and image sizes, >> respectively. Isn't this equation valid only for paraxial case >> (i.e. NAs defined by sines of half angles) and     

Group: sci.physics.research · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.physics.research
Author: Arnold Neumaier
Date: Mar 13, 2008 07:47

Dave Schaack wrote: "Farsang" <youzpalang@netscape.net> wrote in message news:1180623982.886736.10690@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... 2-Your argument about NA comes from " h1 x NA1 = h2 x NA2 ", the optical invariant, where h1 and h2 are object and image sizes, respectively. Isn't this equation valid only for paraxial case (i.e. NAs defined by sines of half angles) and
Show full article (1.98Kb) · Show article thread
Dave Schaack wrote: > "Farsang" <youzpalang@netscape.net> wrote in message > news:1180623982.886736.10690@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > >> 2-Your argument about NA comes from " h1 x NA1 = h2 x NA2 ", the >> optical invariant, where h1 and h2 are object and image sizes, >> respectively. Isn't this equation valid only for paraxial case >> (i.e. NAs defined by sines of half angles) and     

Group: alt.fan.utb.naughtyboy · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in alt.fan.utb.naughtyboy
Author: thanks for the Jap pics
Date: Aug 13, 2007 22:32

On 22 May 2007 10:45:13 -0700, blackhead <larryharson@softhome.net> wrote: On May 22, 3:14 pm, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: On 22 May 2007 06:03:39 -0700, blackhead <larryhar...@softhome.net> wrote: On 21 May, 21:05, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: On 21 May 2007 09:02:08 -0700, blackhead <larryhar...@softhome.net> wrote
Show full article (38.73Kb)
    

Group: sci.optics.fiber · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.optics.fiber
Author: Phil Hobbs
Date: Jun 1, 2007 07:54

Show full article (3.00Kb)
    

Group: sci.optics · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.optics
Author: Phil Hobbs
Date: Jun 1, 2007 07:54

Show full article (3.00Kb)
    

Group: sci.optics.fiber · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.optics.fiber
Author: Phil Hobbs
Date: Jun 1, 2007 07:51

Show full article (3.00Kb)
    

Group: sci.optics · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.optics
Author: Phil Hobbs
Date: Jun 1, 2007 07:51

Show full article (3.00Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Qdot in sci.physics
Author: John C. Polasek
Date: May 22, 2007 12:00

Show full article (3.80Kb)
1 · 2 · next