From: "Ed Cryer" <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Newsgroups: alt.language.latin Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:19:09 -0000 Subject: Re: Arma virumque cano I guess that would take us into neo-Latin, which I can also do without. Actually Neolatin covers a broad spectrum of themes, style, and diction. Here is what I think you will find a well nigh

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:36:18 -0000, "Ed Cryer" <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> wrote: "Robert Stonehouse" <ew65@bcs.org.invalid> wrote in message news:qaitn2lee42slhklk8t9csdve4u1qu6edv@4ax.com... On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:47:17 -0000, "Ed Cryer" <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> wrote: "Robert Stonehouse" <ew65@bcs.org.invalid> wrote in message news:9qcrn2dk0c7gi6bett4srubbqo3om2ppmu@4ax.com..

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:47:17 -0000, "Ed Cryer" <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> wrote: "Robert Stonehouse" <ew65@bcs.org.invalid> wrote in message news:9qcrn2dk0c7gi6bett4srubbqo3om2ppmu@4ax.com... On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:49:13 +0000, Johannes Patruus <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: Robert Stonehouse wrote: ... Fourthly, who is the 'factio'? B&M conclude that it must be Mark Antony

"Albrecht" <Dr.Albrecht.Blank@t-online.de> wrote in message news:1160396171.855230.48060@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... I recently found the following text about music. It is from 1785. [MDLLXXXV IO. PHIL. LAUR. WITHOF ??? 1685 ? 1735 ?] Perhaps it is interesting, because I have not found the text anywhere else. I do not understand very much of latin. Is it written in good latin? Thank