Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 75 articles for 0.868 sec
Thanks to Vladimir. Recently we have received a number of acrid posts endeavouring to criticise Muslims and Islam under the negative "Burden of Proof" fallacy. See this link for an full explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_%%28logical_fallacy%%29 Extract;- The fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative is a logical fallacy of the following form: "X     

Group: soc.religion.islam · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in soc.religion.islam
Author: Zuiko Azumazi
Date: Nov 28, 2006 22:43

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:38:04 -0800, Phlip wrote: Yes, you did, you claimed that it made sense to be skeptical of claims of non-existence of something that has no supporting evidence. That's not being skeptical, that's being silly. ~100 years ago, we had sightings but no "evidence" for the Loch Ness Monster, or the Gorilla. Since then, one has turned out to be a hoax
Show full article (1.70Kb)
"Devon" <spam@4dv.net> wrote in message news:18mdneiDTrzQUHTYnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@4dv.net. > > The one thing I like about the whole thing is that jurplesman@gmail.com > has > posted his or her email address to the newsgroups Devon, Jurriaan Plesman seems to be too modest to tell you but according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jurplesman He is a man and was born in Holland in 1927 and     

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in alt.society.liberalism
Author: Curly Surmudgeon
Date: Nov 25, 2007 17:42

In article <vs64cerjyfoi$4wq2@camporange.org>, Mel Kelly <melkel@xcamporange.org> wrote: B'enyamin C'''ram'er wrote: "Sara Salzman" <catamont@concentric.net> wrote in message news:catamont-51B23F.19355202122006@news.giganews.com... "The fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative is a logical fallacy of the following form: "X is true because there
Show full article (1.67Kb) · Show article thread
"Sara Salzman" <catamont@concentric.net> wrote in message news:catamont-51B23F.19355202122006@news.giganews.com... > "The fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative is a logical > fallacy of the following form: > > "X is true because there is no proof that X is false." > > This is a fallacy whereby the normal burden of proof is reversed. It is > asserted that a hypothesis must     

Group: alt.recovery.addiction.alcoholism · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in alt.recovery.addiction.alcoholism
Author: Sandy Mann
Date: Mar 5, 2007 07:21

In article <cdrr06t56pnh7cqur08ao3kctd56a675nj@4ax.com>, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: Alan Lothian <alanlothian@mac.com> wrote: In article <MPG.2675bb39f0dc5c58989b93@news.eternal-september.org>, Mark Borgerson <mborgerson@comcast.net> wrote: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" (Thank you, Dr Sagan). The silliest thing he
Show full article (6.91Kb)
Thus spake Mike S. <mike@nowhere.com>, Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:48:04 -0400, Anno Domini: >On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:18:31 +1000, Nostromo <nospam@forme.org> wrote: > >>Touche. So long as we acknowledge that both are articles of Faith to *some* >>degree. > >It depends on which definition you use. One definition of faith is 'a >belief in the trustworthiness of an idea'. This would apply to both     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in alt.revisionism
Author: Sara Salzman
Date: Dec 3, 2006 09:55

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:18:31 +1000, Nostromo <nospam@forme.org> wrote: Touche. So long as we acknowledge that both are articles of Faith to *some* degree. It depends on which definition you use. One definition of faith is 'a belief in the trustworthiness of an idea'. This would apply to both science and religion equally. But I think the more common definition would be 'belief in something
Show full article (2.33Kb)
"regn.pickford" wrote: > "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > > "regn.pickford" wrote: > >> "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> > "regn.pickford" wrote: > >> >> "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> > "regn.pickford" wrote: > <snip> > >> >> >> >> The ones your version of events `prove` never existed because >     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in alt.revisionism
Author: B'enyamin C'''ram'er
Date: Dec 2, 2006 20:07

"regn.pickford" wrote: "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message "regn.pickford" wrote: "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message "regn.pickford" wrote: "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message "regn.pickford" wrote: <snip> The ones your version of events `prove` never existed because
Show full article (1.58Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in sci.military.naval
Author: Alan Lothian
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:29

Show full article (2.37Kb)
    

Group: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Author: Nostromo
Date: Sep 4, 2008 00:26

Show full article (9.80Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Author: Mike S.
Date: Sep 3, 2008 10:48

Show full article (3.59Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa.republican · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in alt.politics.usa.republican
Author: RichTravsky
Date: Aug 19, 2008 20:23

Show full article (2.65Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Proof That The Loch Ness Monster Exists in uk.politics.misc
Author: RichTravsky
Date: Aug 19, 2008 20:23

Show full article (2.65Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · next