<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <atom:link rel="search"
    href="http://www.nnseek.com/nnseek_com_os_descr.xml"
    type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
    title="Search in newsgroups" />
  <title>Search result for Profound</title>
  <link>http://www.nnseek.com/Profound_s.html</link>
  <description>Search results for Profound</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:15:07 PDT</lastBuildDate>
  

  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[US-NJ: Bridgewater-Director, Training]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.science.geology.jobs/us_nj_bridgewater_director_training_131712509m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.science.geology.jobs/us_nj_bridgewater_director_training_131712509m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... and the execution of a strategic training plan for USMAO. Ensures that the best up to date learning and teaching methodologies are used in order to induce and maintain <b>profound</b> behavioral changes that are measurable and repeated. Responsible for the maintenance of a validated system for assessing training needs, tracking training execution through a process matching or exceeding regulations. ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.science.geology.jobs/">alt.science.geology.jobs</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.science.geology.jobs/us_nj_bridgewater_director_training_131712509t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.science.geology.jobs/us_nj_bridgewater_director_training_131712509m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:15:07 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Recaps: Finals Week 10 Performances, 5/13/2008]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84249316m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84249316m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[..., who pointed out a long time ago that  DavidA's fan base is rabid but static.  I have no idea what that means (rabid but static). Bottom line should   the winner possess the more <b>profound</b> talent or be the most marketable?   You can further break down marketability into short term and long term.   In terms of talent and long term marketability, Archuleta is the best   bet. As for an ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/">alt.tv.americanidol</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84040676t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84249316m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:51:16 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Recaps: Finals Week 10 Performances, 5/13/2008]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84218596m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84218596m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[..., who pointed out a long time ago that  DavidA's fan base is rabid but static.    I have no idea what that means (rabid but static). Bottom line should   the winner possess the more <b>profound</b> talent or be the most marketable?   You can further break down marketability into short term and long term.   In terms of talent and long term marketability, Archuleta is the best   bet. As for an advantage ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/">alt.tv.americanidol</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84040676t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.tv.americanidol/recaps_finals_week_10_performances_5_13_2008_84218596m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:14:21 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68727251m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68727251m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68727251m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:59:06 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726995m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726995m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... had no problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson?  ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726995m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:56:25 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726739m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726739m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68726739m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:56:05 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68725715m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68725715m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... had no problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson?  ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68725715m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:51:47 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723923m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723923m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... he had no problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson?  ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723923m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:26:44 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Holy Spirit's killfile]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723155m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723155m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... he had no problem slaughtering  people for spiritual reasons. Actual if you get the basic lexicon and  rap down and have a receptive audience, it not at all to generate  "<b>profound</b>." I'm sure a competent programmer could devise an automatic  reply program which would be indistinguishable from your replies.  I mean hell?  Why blame Charlie Manson?  Sharon ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/">talk.religion.coursemiracle</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_67566035t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/talk.religion.coursemiracle/the_holy_spirit_s_killfile_68723155m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:19:00 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Archbishop: "The Moral Evil of Contraception"]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.atheism/archbishop_the_moral_evil_of_contraception_281878268m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.atheism/archbishop_the_moral_evil_of_contraception_281878268m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[...of the harm of contraception and the great value of Natural  Family Planning (NFP). Further, it challenges married couples, healthcare  professionals and clergy to live and teach these <b>profound</b> truths about human  sexuality and dignity."    Does the encyclical say anything about the blessings that flow to the  women who conceive after being raped?    Archbishop Prendergast's approach to...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.atheism/">alt.atheism</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.atheism/archbishop_the_moral_evil_of_contraception_281719548t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.atheism/archbishop_the_moral_evil_of_contraception_281878268m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:56:58 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>