Previsualization
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 30 articles for 0.303 sec
My architecture is i386. The packages *amd64 are not applicables, i suppose. El ds 16 de 02 del 2008 a les 12:03 +0000, en/na Debian Bug Tracking System va escriure: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the libsane package: > > #458478: [avision] HP7400 troubles starting with cvs 20071213 > > It has been closed by Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Daniel Elias
Date: Feb 16, 2008 10:50

reassign 458478 libsane 1.0.19~cvs20071213-1 retitle 458478 [avision] HP7400 troubles starting with cvs 20071213 forwarded 458478 sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org thanks daniel_elias <daniel@danielelias.jazztel.es> wrote: The Scanner HP Scanjet 7400 c does not work; the command scanimage - L detects the device, and also the software Sane or Kooka; but when trying to acquire
Show full article (8.24Kb) · Show article thread
Package: sane Version: 1.0.14-5 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages sane depends on: ii     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Julien BLACHE
Date: Dec 31, 2007 13:10

Chris, You just defined the whole of what "Photography Is" very eloquently. The equipment is a tool like a brush. You have to or actually must previsualize the image then be able to grab it. In "Weddings" that grab can be a hoot though. Sometimes you must move as fast as you can to try and capture that one special moment, while running and setting your camera, making sure your flash
Show full article (1.11Kb) · Show article thread
In article <161120072202275484%%cmn-nospam@houston.rr.com>, Mark Nobles <cmn-nospam@houston.rr.com> wrote: > Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net> wrote: > > > Mark Nobles <cmn-nospam@houston.rr.com> wrote: > > > Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net> wrote: > > > > > > > previz > > > > > > What does that mean in English? > > > > sorry > > > > Pre Visual > > > > little stick figure animatics*     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: daniel_elias
Date: Dec 31, 2007 12:20

LOL, actually not true. The only troll and anger I see here is you. Before digital, a true photographer would be inside the darkroom doing what they had to do to make the film and prints good enough for there liking. Without digital color photography, we always color corrected and cropped and then spotted. You for some reason cant except the fact that everything that is done is the exact
Show full article (2.76Kb)
LOL, actually not true. The only troll and anger I see here is you. Before digital, a true photographer would be inside the darkroom doing what they had to do to make the film and prints good enough for there liking. Without digital color photography, we always color corrected and cropped and then spotted. You for some reason cant except the fact that everything that is done is the exact     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.photography
Author: Not4wood
Date: Dec 26, 2007 19:31

On Oct 4, 9:56 am, Pat <gro...@artisticphotography.us> wrote: On Oct 3, 11:02 pm, "Not4wood" <no_mgottes@spam_verizon.net> wrote: Hehe, Pat. Really nicely done. Truthfully though, this argument has been around for a very long time and wont go away. A lot of people will just argue for arguments sake to the point whether they actually believe it or not is immaterial
Show full article (2.27Kb) · Show article thread
On Oct 3, 11:02 pm, "Not4wood" <no_mgottes@spam_verizon.net> wrote: > Hehe, Pat. Really nicely done. > > Truthfully though, this argument has been around for a very long time and > wont go away. A lot of people will just argue for arguments sake to the > point whether they actually believe it or not is immaterial. > > For some reason I think a lot of people if they be a true fan of the >     

Group: alt.tv.startrek.tos · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.tv.startrek.tos
Author: Anim8rFSK
Date: Nov 16, 2007 22:31

Hehe, Pat. Really nicely done. Truthfully though, this argument has been around for a very long time and wont go away. A lot of people will just argue for arguments sake to the point whether they actually believe it or not is immaterial. For some reason I think a lot of people if they be a true fan of the classical arts are threatened by Photography for some reason as the greats might
Show full article (1.59Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.rec.photo.misc · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in uk.rec.photo.misc
Author: Not4wood
Date: Oct 14, 2007 13:10

Show full article (3.36Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.photography
Author: Not4wood
Date: Oct 14, 2007 13:10

Show full article (3.36Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.photography
Author: UC
Date: Oct 5, 2007 14:08

Show full article (7.81Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.photography
Author: Pat
Date: Oct 4, 2007 06:56

Show full article (7.45Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for Previsualization in alt.photography
Author: Not4wood
Date: Oct 3, 2007 20:02

Show full article (7.05Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next