Pptp0
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 14 articles for 0.302 sec
Hello, There's a problem with my MPD which I cannot reproduce but it appears from time to time. Here's complete session log and mpd configs: Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] using interface ng0 Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] link: OPEN event Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: Open event Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek     

Group: lucky.freebsd.questions · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.questions
Author: Kirill Alpeev
Date: Mar 13, 2008 14:12

On Sep 27, 6:54 am, Rob Kendrick <n...@rjek.com> wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:01:35 -0700, Alan Williams wrote: On Sep 26, 3:02 am, Rob Kendrick <n...@rjek.com> wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:32:28 -0700, Mike Carter wrote: Does RISC OS support the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol yet? Not to my knowledge. It's a pretty nasty Cisco/Microsoft hybrid VPN protocol
Show full article (9.74Kb)
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:01:35 -0700, Alan Williams wrote: > On Sep 26, 3:02 am, Rob Kendrick <n...@rjek.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:32:28 -0700, Mike Carter wrote: >> > Does RISC OS support the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol yet? >> >> Not to my knowledge. It's a pretty nasty Cisco/Microsoft hybrid VPN >> protocol, for which there are numerous better alternatives that might be     

Group: comp.sys.acorn.networking · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in comp.sys.acorn.networking
Author: Alan Williams
Date: Sep 27, 2007 00:32

On Sep 26, 3:02 am, Rob Kendrick <n...@rjek.com> wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:32:28 -0700, Mike Carter wrote: Does RISC OS support the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol yet? Not to my knowledge. It's a pretty nasty Cisco/Microsoft hybrid VPN protocol, for which there are numerous better alternatives that might be worth you investigating. But I doubt any of them will be available
Show full article (2.04Kb) · Show article thread
I am running Freebsd 6.2-p6 with eGroupWare-1.2.106_1, dovecot-1.0.r2 and mpd-3.18_5. When I connect from home via vpn to the server then try to check mail thru egroupware I get imap authentication errors. Anyone at work checking their mail will also get the same error, kill the vpn connection everything works fine. I would like to be able to work from home and not block others     

Group: comp.sys.acorn.networking · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in comp.sys.acorn.networking
Author: Rob Kendrick
Date: Sep 26, 2007 13:54

Ganbold wrote: Mihai Tanasescu wrote: Sorry for asking as a follow-up to your question...but do you have a working config for MPD and pptp. I'm desperately trying to get mine to work...but mpd refuses to listen to connections on my interface (it starts, it gives no errors, it loads the pptp1 config, I can access its console, etc). Something
Show full article (1.19Kb) · Show article thread
Mihai Tanasescu wrote: > Sorry for asking as a follow-up to your question...but do you have a > working config for MPD and pptp. > > > I'm desperately trying to get mine to work...but mpd refuses to listen > to connections on my interface (it starts, it gives no errors, it > loads the pptp1 config, I can access its console, etc). > > > > > > Something like: default: load pptp0     

Group: comp.sys.acorn.networking · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in comp.sys.acorn.networking
Author: Alan Williams
Date: Sep 26, 2007 07:01

Jim Stapleton wrote: I can't find a way to specify mppe-128 for either pptp or pppd in the man files, and every doc I see (including the man pages examples, which don't work when I specify it in the file) seem to suggest that I use either "mppe-128" or "require-mppe-128" for pppd, neither of which work. Any suggestions? As far as I know, pppd in FreeBSD does not support natively mppc
Show full article (0.96Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:49 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > 232487741 > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > >>pptp0: connecting to 208.206.3.5 1723 > >>[vpn] IPCP: LayerUp > >> 172.30.29.9 -> 208.206.3.5 > > > >>ifconfig > >>[root@bofh tom]# ifconfig ng0 > >>ng0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1396 > >> inet 172.30.29.9 --> 208.206.3.5 netmask 0xffffffff     

Group: lucky.freebsd.questions · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.questions
Author: Mark Busby
Date: Jul 27, 2007 10:05

OK, I figured ng0 stood for negraph, so I switched nve0 go ng0, and it had *some* improvement. I get a lot farther along. (When I man'ed ng0 - or attempted to, I accidentally did nge, and though that the sample was using a national semiconductors gigabit-ethernet controller, and I had to switch it to my own nvidia based system). Anyway, now I get a log string of connection setup stuff, which
Show full article (1.74Kb)
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Mihai Tanasescu
Date: Jul 25, 2007 04:09

Show full article (2.38Kb)
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Ganbold
Date: Jul 25, 2007 04:03

Show full article (2.26Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Artyom Viklenko
Date: Jun 24, 2007 01:31

Show full article (2.28Kb)
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Tom McLaughlin
Date: Apr 20, 2007 14:24

Show full article (3.37Kb)
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Pptp0 in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Jim Stapleton
Date: Apr 20, 2007 06:28

Show full article (6.32Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next