On May 26, 7:41 pm, RichAsianKid <richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote: On May 24, 12:41 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote: I had very quickly read through the article and it is very interesting. Though I may not agree with some notions it is interesting that such tests on intelligence had been conducted based on racial, sexual and body mass. However having
On May 24, 12:41 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote: I had very quickly read through the article and it is very interesting. Though I may not agree with some notions it is interesting that such tests on intelligence had been conducted based on racial, sexual and body mass. However having observed nature and all it idiots that had chosen to reveal themselves to me,
On May 1, 8:51 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: "We need someone like AJ Weberman to do a [sic] in-depth review." <<< Who's that? Let me guess....a "CTer" possibly? shit you'd prefer the POZ , right? But all this begs the question, why c an't you find a 'legit' Lone Nutter to write a review of this monstrous work? Three weeks to release and nothing so far? Come ON
Although Cox speaks of staying calm in the face of financial turmoil, lawmakers across the political spectrum counter that this is actually another way of saying that his agency remained passive during the worst global financial crisis in decades. And they say that Cox's stewardship before this year -- focusing on deregulation as the agency's staff shrank -- laid the groundwork for the meltdown
Although Cox speaks of staying calm in the face of financial turmoil, lawmakers across the political spectrum counter that this is actually another way of saying that his agency remained passive during the worst global financial crisis in decades. And they say that Cox's stewardship before this year -- focusing on deregulation as the agency's staff shrank -- laid the groundwork for the meltdown
