...s no point I believe you've followed the rules as well. As you mentioned on your blog, planet is for active participants in Debian, not for posts about Debian only. The "rules" have ... back and made it more explicit just in case. I should probably link that page from planet.debian.org itself. Later, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.cc/ -----BEGIN ...

Bastian Venthur wrote: Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" Some people think pdo needs adjusting, some don't. The solution Lars proposed leaves pdo as it is (which satisfies the latter camp, which includes me). -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org ...

...So I don't see any objective difference between these that could be useful in distinguishing between "things that should be on Planet Debian" and "things that shouldn't be on Planet Debian". It's just a line between "things Steve enjoys reading" and "things Steve doesn't enjoy reading", which isn't ...

...Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" (assuming ...) which one of them they want to see? Planet would then display the contents of both sections ... I think you're assuming that Planet Debian is only about the web page, ... proposed solutions so far (kicking people from the planet or creating a second one). -- Bastian Venthur...

... Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" (assuming the feeders assign ...> (via check boxes) which one of them they want to see? Planet would then display the contents of both sections by default but have two...or both :) ) of them. I think you're assuming that Planet Debian is only about the web page, but it's not. ...

... so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" [...] personal / .... This way we could satisfy everybody without kicking people from the planet. But it is somewhat important to have booth sections on one site... it optional to exclude a section. This way we keep the planet as it is by default and just provide an extra option ...

...[...] Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" [...] personal / technical may be a ..., which has been suggested before. If one gets more popular than the current planet, that would seem a good reason to change the target of the planet.debian.net hostname. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk...

...in subscribing to it? Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into something like "personal" and "technical" (assuming the feeders assign their blog-feeds to the appropriate ... then let the user check (via check boxes) which one of them they want to see? Planet would then display the contents of both sections by default but have two check boxes somewhere, where...

..., Raphael Hertzog wrote: This is "Planet Debian" so it should be mainly ...what a person thinks about; a planet is an aggregation of blogs of...from the above that "this is Planet Debian" does not necessary imply "...a good thing -- if not for Planet Debian, I wouldn't have known...it in a Debian context. If Planet Debian wouldn't have these ...'t know this. I read Planet Debian with liferea, and yes, ...

... 04, 2007 at 05:54:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? No. And personally, I believe that's a good thing. To me, Planet Debian is about people, not technology. The fact that it just happens to be mostly about technology (...