Pillari
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 31 articles for 0.303 sec
CliffB wrote: > On Mar 5, 12:19 pm, The Left's Worse Nightmare > <razzlefr...@papernapkin.net> wrote: >> CliffB wrote: >>> Rather successfully too. All this scare tactic shit about what the >>> Republicans may do; they just can set back and let Hillary take the >>> attack to Barack as she and her minions did this week; Obarmel's team >>> also has shown it can dish the crap and dirty tactics     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: The Left's Worse Nightmare
Date: Mar 5, 2008 12:17

On Mar 5, 12:19 pm, The Left's Worse Nightmare <razzlefr...@papernapkin.net> wrote: CliffB wrote: Rather successfully too. All this scare tactic shit about what the Republicans may do; they just can set back and let Hillary take the attack to Barack as she and her minions did this week; Obarmel's team also has shown it can dish the crap and dirty tactics in the grand old
Show full article (1.49Kb) · Show article thread
CliffB wrote: > Rather successfully too. All this scare tactic shit about what the > Republicans may do; they just can set back and let Hillary take the > attack to Barack as she and her minions did this week; Obarmel's team > also has shown it can dish the crap and dirty tactics in the grand old > Chicago tradition as well. Nice the way they tried to game the Texas > caucus carnival. The next     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: CliffB
Date: Mar 5, 2008 10:13

On Mar 31, 6:35 pm, miranda <thehowep...@gmail.com> wrote: Some how, this got glossed over: If a germane 5%% of some piece of writing is false, the whole piece of writing is false. Jeeze-Marie Miranda! Don't you understand that there is no such thing as "objective history" nor is there any such creature as "objective facts"!!! EVERYTHING IS SPIN!!! "Spin" doesn't mean it's necessary
Show full article (1.24Kb) · Show article thread
b wrote: "Well, I count 4 major truths in the article you admit are factually correct, yet you state that 95%% of the article is "nonsense" If you weren't so blind you would see that 95%% of the article is factual and 5%% is Republican spin." Some how, this got glossed over: If a germane 5%% of some piece of writing is false, the whole piece of writing is false. Other than it's so clumsy     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: The Left's Worse Nightmare
Date: Mar 5, 2008 09:19

On Mar 5, 12:30 pm, Ackneigh Wombustre <lilhor...@yahoo.com> wrote: Is Obama BOMBIN' out? Could be. If he doesn't start to come down hard on Hillary's and Bill's past -- like Travelgate and her dead lover Vice Foster's still mysterious involvement in several controversies -- and even revive Blowjob Gate -- Barack will be eaten up by the Clinton blame game. Obama should
Show full article (0.78Kb) · Show article thread
Is Obama BOMBIN' out? Could be. If he doesn't start to come down hard on Hillary's and Bill's past -- like Travelgate and her dead lover Vice Foster's still mysterious involvement in several controversies -- and even revive Blowjob Gate -- Barack will be eaten up by the Clinton blame game. Obama should have enough sense to know that you don't fight law- breakers like the Clintons     

Group: alt.gathering.rainbow · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in alt.gathering.rainbow
Author: bodhi
Date: Mar 31, 2008 21:10

Rather successfully too. All this scare tactic shit about what the Republicans may do; they just can set back and let Hillary take the attack to Barack as she and her minions did this week; Obarmel's team also has shown it can dish the crap and dirty tactics in the grand old Chicago tradition as well. Nice the way they tried to game the Texas caucus carnival. The next month or two should be an
Show full article (3.81Kb) · Show article thread
On Feb 22, 10:02 am, BobR <re...@r-a-reed-assoc.com> wrote: > Sam Hill wrote: > > One Major Difference Between Clinton and Obama? Their Records On Cuba > > By John Nichols, The Nation. Posted February 20, 2008. > > > If we look past their bland pronouncements on the campaign trail, it becomes > > clear that Clinton and Obama have widely divergent views on Cuba. > > > It is often suggested that     

Group: alt.gathering.rainbow · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in alt.gathering.rainbow
Author: miranda
Date: Mar 31, 2008 17:35

On Feb 22, 10:02 am, BobR <re...@r-a-reed-assoc.com> wrote: Sam Hill wrote: One Major Difference Between Clinton and Obama? Their Records On Cuba By John Nichols, The Nation. Posted February 20, 2008. If we look past their bland pronouncements on the campaign trail, it becomes clear that Clinton and Obama have widely divergent views on Cuba. It is often suggested that
Show full article (2.63Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: CliffB
Date: Mar 5, 2008 10:09

Show full article (2.59Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: Ackneigh Wombustre
Date: Mar 5, 2008 09:30

Show full article (1.11Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in talk.politics.misc
Author: CliffB
Date: Mar 4, 2008 23:06

Show full article (0.55Kb)
    

Group: co.politics · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in co.politics
Author: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
Date: Feb 22, 2008 11:07

Show full article (6.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: wash.politics · Group Profile · Search for Pillari in wash.politics
Author: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
Date: Feb 22, 2008 11:07

Show full article (6.35Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · next