ixvivxi wrote: "Immortalist" <reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159897855.183598.93020@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... chazwin wrote: Is there anything you can be sure of to make a start on this one ??? If there is let's hear it! Please don't say god! Kant would make a claim that the two things we can know the best are

chazwin wrote: Is there anything you can be sure of to make a start on this one ??? If there is let's hear it! Please don't say god! Kant would make a claim that the two things we can know the best are space and time, else we would't have the space or times to participate in concepts about our selves. The information you seek seems to have not yet arrived but we are trying

"Immortalist" <reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159815193.418191.93870@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... Immortalist wrote: http://www.google.com/search?q=define%%3Athink It always assumes, however, some kind of cause and effect scheme, with the consequence being a of result of what preceded it. In everyday speech, any thought one arrives at through thinking

Immortalist wrote: http://www.google.com/search?q=define%%3Athink It always assumes, however, some kind of cause and effect scheme, with the consequence being a of result of what preceded it. In everyday speech, any thought one arrives at through thinking based on facts and information can be called a _________. What IS? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conclusion Is genuine knowledge