...of HumorLinks. http://www.humorlinks.com/cgi-bin/sites/page.cgi?g=Academic%%2Findex.h... Scroll down to the picture of the elephant and the blind men and click on: "A new perspective on laughter and humor" Let me know what you think. Baz Baz, thanks for the link. I enjoyed reading your informative and provocative essay. Probably (and rightly) responses from this NG ...
... http://www.humorlinks.com/cgi-bin/sites/page.cgi?g=Academic%%2Findex.h... Scroll down to the picture of the elephant and the blind men and click on: "A new perspective on laughter and humor" Let me know what you think. Baz You demonstrate with amazing clarity and deep conviction the utter paucity of evolutionary psychology and it obsession with insisting...
...thanks for sharing your work. Fitting laughter or humor into a strict category is certainly a perspective. "The basic process of laughing can be defined as the displacement of emotive neural activity, ...'positive' human activity into what seems, to this layman, to be a rather narrow perspective. A more open approach might be that laughter and humor are the results of different types...
... http://www.humorlinks.com/cgi-bin/sites/page.cgi?g=Academic%%2Findex.h... Scroll down to the picture of the elephant and the blind men and click on: "A new perspective on laughter and humor" Let me know what you think. Baz You demonstrate with amazing clarity and deep conviction the utter paucity of evolutionary psychology and it obsession with insisting that there...
...my piece: Laughter as a displacement activity: the implications for humor theory. It can be accessed through the academic section of HumorLinks. http://www.humorlinks.com/cgi-bin/sites/page.cgi?g=Academic%%2Findex.html&d=1&imp=yes Scroll down to the picture of the elephant and the blind men and click on: "A new perspective on laughter and humor" Let me know what you think. Baz
..., and find myself lost. Not to worry ;) It comes from so many different directions, That's the key to reading this group. As you read you'll recognize that wide variety of perspectives are represented. Eventually you'll pick up on who writes from a point of view similar to your outlook. When threads get long, I'll first read what what a few particular individuals say to give ...
"Ed" <nospam@invalid.com> writes Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please! "Marcel Hendrix" <mhx@iae.nl> wrote in message news:99151425163559@frunobulax.edu... Instead, the standard committee tried to find the best possible compromises. The result is / was that *everyone* was more or less angry and upset. Decisions made on sound technical grounds tend to be...
"Marcel Hendrix" <mhx@iae.nl> wrote in message news:99151425163559@frunobulax.edu... "roger.levy@gmail.com" <roger.levy@gmail.com> writes Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please! Exactly. A standard system must have a Return Stack whose entries are the same size as cells and data stack items. And it must respond to R, R@, and . What the standard ...
Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> writes Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please! roger.levy@gmail.com wrote: Frankly, I am shocked. ANS defines Forth's return stack that way? That's odd to me. This is for abominations like F-PC. F-PC actually used the return stack for return addresses, but it was a segmented 16 bit system, and the return addresses ...
"roger.levy@gmail.com" <roger.levy@gmail.com> writes Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please! Exactly. A standard system must have a Return Stack whose entries are the same size as cells and data stack items. And it must respond to R, R@, and . What the standard *doesn't* require is that the system must use it for return addresses. Frankly, I am ...
