...leverage their knowledge about their CLR language. The mere fact that...in their syntax and supporting functions. If you have to process...has equvalent to this aggregation function. The standart SQL has SUM...amount of calculations which native functions have to do is enormous...is the point to have CLR. Or let me put another...expect the same performance from a CLR function when compared to...

...92 has equvalent to this aggregation function. The standart SQL has SUM, ...that amount of calculations which native functions have to do is enormous ...it looks like for me that CLR is very slow for this ... pure T-SQL ? I hoped CLR is good candidate here. Thanks,... same number of rows my function takes almost twice time more.... expect the same performance from a CLR function when compared to ...

TimXox wrote: Hi, I created CLR aggregate function MULT which works like Sum...it does *. I compare the performance of my function with: SELECT exp(sum...the same number of rows my function takes almost twice time more. ...cannot expect the same performance from a CLR function when compared to a simple native T-SQL...it will always outperform a similar CLR function because of the overhead ...

... execution, you can achieve significant performance increases in some scenarios….. Managed ... managed code for CPU-intensive functions and procedures that feature complex ... calculations) to SQL Server. The performance gain is huge, but code...and re-write calculation functions in CLR. ( I used formula exp...SqlServer.Server.Format.UserDefined, //use clr serialization to serialize the intermediate...

...They will handle floating point errors, have good functions, etc. SQL is not a computational language. CLR will stink and make maintaining the code a... native language. As an aside, your PRD() function is wrong. Here is a version of the aggregate product function in SQL. You will need to have the logarithm and exponential functions. They are not standards, but they are very...

...-AA89-4026-9209-1522D2891F66@microsoft.com... Hi, I created CLR aggregate function MULT which works like Sum, but instead of + it does *. I compare the performance of my function with: SELECT exp(sum(log(AttributionValue+1))) the result is the same , but for the same number of rows my function takes almost twice time more. Please advice, Tim....

... be as fast as the built-in functions that are shipped with the product... --...-1522D2891F66@microsoft.com... Hi, I created CLR aggregate function MULT which works like Sum, but instead of + it does *. I compare the performance of my function with: SELECT exp(sum(log(AttributionValue+1))) the result is ... for the same number of rows my function takes almost twice time more. ...

Hi, I created CLR aggregate function MULT which works like Sum, but instead of + it does *. I compare the performance of my function with: SELECT exp(sum(log(AttributionValue+1))) the result is the same , but for the same number of rows my function takes almost twice time more. Please advice, Tim.

... SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function written in C#. Why is... from sql server to a CLR function seems to be relatively ...in C#? No. T-SQL and CLR are if not different universes ... boundary is higher than calling a C# function from another C#... a truth that measuring the performance of something can affect that performance, and this amplified even more the smaller the numbers are....

... between SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function written in C#. Why is...getting from sql server to a CLR function seems to be relatively slow for nanosecond calculations: DECLARE @before bigint...in C#? No. T-SQL and CLR are if not different universes or... boundary is higher than calling a C# function from another C# ... a truth that measuring the performance of something can affect that ...