|
|
 |
| found 951 articles for 0.312 sec |
  |
Group: comp.dcom.sdhsonet · Group Profile · Search for Pdhs in comp.dcom.sdhsonet
Author: Huub van Helvoort
Date: Jul 2, 2008 01:31
Bonjour Michelot, You wrote: Before, we opposed PDH to SDH. And we say that, in PDH, we have to drop a tributary keeping all the intermediate multiplexing steps. For example, to extract an E1 from E4, we need to get the E3 from the E4, then the E2 from the E3 and, at last the E1 from the E2. Right. Of course, this is done today in an ASIC circuit, and not in separate
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) · Show article thread |
|
| Bonsoir Huub,
Before, we opposed PDH to SDH. And we say that, in PDH, we have to
drop a tributary keeping all the intermediate multiplexing steps.
For example, to extract an E1 from E4, we need to get the E3 from the
E4, then the E2 from the E3 and, at last the E1 from the E2.
Of course, this is done today in an ASIC circuit, and not in separate
equipments.
It seems that it is the same |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: comp.dcom.sdhsonet · Group Profile · Search for Pdhs in comp.dcom.sdhsonet
Author: Michelot
Date: Jun 27, 2008 04:09
Received: from [193.252.38.65] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Tue, 6 May 2008 05:31:39 -0400 Message-ID: <000801c8af5b$04e6f565$ec7178bf@rkyuanor> From: "dru georgia" <mskiles@church-systems.com> To: <[removed]> Subject: meddiscounts. your code is #pdh Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 07:44:10 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain
|
| Show full article (0.50Kb) · Show article thread |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|
