Packeting
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 253 articles for 0.588 sec
Posted at 2010-05-11 11:56:37 BST by Andrews & Arnold Update #6: 2010-06-08 11:08:39 BST We are seeing low level packet loss on BE lines during peak (office) hours. This is seen as small amounts of red on the top of the CQM Graphs. We're not seeing this on BT lines and this does look like congestion in the BE network. We have sent BE examples and they are investigating     

Group: uk.net.providers.aaisp · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in uk.net.providers.aaisp
Author: Andrews & Arnold
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:08

On Jun 7, 4:14 pm, Ben Crowell <crowel...@lightSPAMandISmatterEVIL.com> wrote: REI also has these (GooToob)  http://www.rei.com/product/793920  http://www.rei.com/product/781811  http://www.rei.com/product/781800 which are marketed for use with shampoo, etc., but could be used for food. They seem kind of wasteful, though, in terms of weight and volume. The weight of each container
Show full article (2.99Kb)
My firewall has two interfaces towards internet: if_ext{1,2} and one interface towards my home LAN: if_int. I want to binat one host (core7) with if_ext2, and do regular nat for the rest of the hosts on if_ext1. The ruleset below seems to work fine, except that I cannot SSH from outside world to core7. All packets go fine until core7 sends the first reply packet. My current understanding     

Group: rec.backcountry · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in rec.backcountry
Author: mkt
Date: Jun 7, 2010 17:31

On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:24:14 -0700, hlillywh@juno.com wrote: REI sells re-fillable containers of various sizes, some re-fillable tubes like toothpaste tubes, some different shapes. Maybe some of them will work for you. The REI web site has these (Coughlan squeeze tubes) http://www.rei.com/product/696007 , which are similar to the ones I used to use. They're kind of on the large side
Show full article (2.42Kb) · Show article thread
Posted at 2010-05-14 09:47:14 BST by Andrews & Arnold Update #3: 2010-05-14 11:06:39 BST We are seeing quite a bit of packet loss on all 21CN-BRAS-RED2-L-NWS MUSSWELL HILL lines. BT have been informed. _Update 14 May 2010 10:03:49_ BT are investigating. Should hear more in the next couple of hours. > > > > _Update 14 May 2010 11:06:39_ > > BT have raised     

Group: mailing.openbsd.misc · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in mailing.openbsd.misc
Author: Teemu Rinta-aho
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:32

Posted at 2010-05-14 09:47:14 BST by Andrews & Arnold Update #2: 2010-05-14 11:06:03 BST We are seeing quite a bit of packet loss on all 21CN-BRAS-RED2-L-NWS MUSSWELL HILL lines. BT have been informed. _Update 14 May 2010 10:03:49_ BT are investigating. Should hear more in the next couple of hours. URL: http://new.incident.aaisp.net.uk/?incident=231 --
Show full article (1.77Kb)
Posted at 2010-05-14 09:47:14 BST by Andrews & Arnold Update #1: 2010-05-14 10:03:49 BST We are seeing quite a bit of packet loss on all 21CN-BRAS-RED2-L-NWS MUSSWELL HILL lines. BT have been informed. > > > > _Update 14 May 2010 10:03:49_ > > BT are investigating. Should hear more in the next couple of hours. URL: http://new.incident.aaisp.net.uk/?incident=231 --     

Group: rec.backcountry · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in rec.backcountry
Author: Ben Crowell
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:14

jadawin 2010-01-29 08:02:02 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: net/p5-Net-Packet Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Log: - Update to 3.27 - Respect NOPORTEXAMPLES PR: ports/142825 Submitted by: Sofian Brabez <sbrabez gmail.com> Approved by: maintainer (timeout) Revision Changes Path 1.13 +8 -2 ports/net/p5-Net
Show full article (1.60Kb)
Good day! I have a FreeBSD shaping bridge based on lagg+dummynet, this is a part from ruleset: 03001 20 7840 ngtee 10 ip from any to any out xmit lagg1 03003 0 0 allow log ip from any to any So, the problem is that packets after passing rule with ngtee disappear (droped?) and are not returned back to the next rule. net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 0     

Group: uk.net.providers.aaisp · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in uk.net.providers.aaisp
Author: Andrews & Arnold
Date: May 14, 2010 03:06

Show full article (0.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.net.providers.aaisp · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in uk.net.providers.aaisp
Author: Andrews & Arnold
Date: May 14, 2010 03:06

Show full article (0.44Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.net.providers.aaisp · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in uk.net.providers.aaisp
Author: Andrews & Arnold
Date: May 14, 2010 02:03

Show full article (0.44Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.net.providers.aaisp · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in uk.net.providers.aaisp
Author: Andrews & Arnold
Date: May 14, 2010 01:47

Show full article (0.28Kb)
    

Group: fa.freebsd.cvsall · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in fa.freebsd.cvsall
Author: Philippe Audeoud
Date: Jan 29, 2010 00:02

Show full article (0.72Kb)
    

Group: lucky.freebsd.net · Group Profile · Search for Packeting in lucky.freebsd.net
Author: Vladimir Osipenko
Date: Jan 28, 2010 08:06

Show full article (0.53Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next