Original motion at the Big Bang
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 837 articles for 0.124 sec
Re: More on the "Big Bang"...     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.physics
Author: Eric Gisse
Date: Sep 10, 2007 05:21

...>expansion back to a primal point of origin. The background radiation is a central part of the big bang theory. As well as the relative abundances of ... at periodic intervals, maybe not in simple harmonic motion, but perhaps a slightly distorted version thereof. My ... air molecules in a pipe organ pipe. They're all inclined to vary in harmonic motion, although never simple harmonic motion....
Show full article (2.76Kb) · Show article thread
Re: big bang paradox     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Pax
Date: Dec 18, 2006 01:27

... of still-coalescing plasma, are they? No, definite stellar activity. is the real Big Bang paradox, since the universe is calculated to be between 12 and 15 billion years old. ... had only used 15 billion up to that point... Logically, there is no way to see the original churning stuff produced by the BB, because we are part of that stuff...
Show full article (8.21Kb)
Re: The Popperian Shibboleth of "Falsifiability"     

Group: alt.atheism · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in alt.atheism
Author: Mackie
Date: Oct 26, 2006 05:43

...Big Bang Boom! Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:22 PM Worries ..., you're talking about "speed". Hang in there now. Spacetime is speed, motion because that's what the universe is; there are no static, fixed bodies here, and as all things ..., about its axis, with the solar system, the galaxy, and on up to the original motion of the Big Bang. At what percentage of lightspeed do you suppose ...
Show full article (8.39Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The Popperian Shibboleth of "Falsifiability"     

Group: alt.atheism · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in alt.atheism
Author: Mackie
Date: Oct 25, 2006 10:35

... the velocity of light. Okay, so if you should attempt to compute an addition of velocities for all the combined motions of the Earth, just what do you suppose you would come up with? I speak of all the above-... motions, of the Earth about its axis, with the solar system, the galaxy, and on up to the original motion of the Big Bang. How close to the speed of light do you suppose this ...
Show full article (4.60Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Question about the Big Bang and Dark Matter     

Group: sci.astro · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.astro
Author: dlzc
Date: Aug 23, 2006 19:21

..., and (3) was explainable as the inertial motion of the products of the Big Bang. But if expansion of space itself is the cause ... cause. It is believed that there was no matter in the Universe at the instant of the Big Bang, so temperature would not be necessary to initiate ... a jargon term for a description. That doesn't help the original poster unless he goes on to look up the term ...
Show full article (8.48Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Question about the Big Bang and Dark Matter     

Group: sci.astro · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.astro
Author: Jeff Root
Date: Aug 22, 2006 10:33

David A. Smith replied to Rising-Star8471: When I think of the Big Bang, I think of an explosion... It wasn't an explosion of... Bang, and (3) was explainable as the inertial motion of the products of the Big Bang. But if expansion of space itself is the cause of...substituted a jargon term for a description. That doesn't help the original poster unless he goes on to look up the term ...
Show full article (4.26Kb) · Show article thread
Chapt 3, Fiberglass Experiment; Refraction Redshift, not a Doppler #82; ATOM TOTALITY     

Group: sci.astro · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.astro
Author: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: May 13, 2010 18:55

... Arp's "theory" is not an experimentally verifiable *known process*. Therefore I stand by my original statement. Craig as spokesman in defense of Big Bang theory is the dog wagging the tail spokesman, for Craig has never been able to explain how Space in motion of a Big Bang expansion couples with material matter of the Cosmos. What ...
Show full article (7.18Kb) · Show article thread
Chapt 3, Fiberglass Experiment; Refraction Redshift, not a Doppler #82; ATOM TOTALITY     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.physics
Author: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: May 13, 2010 18:55

... Arp's "theory" is not an experimentally verifiable *known process*. Therefore I stand by my original statement. Craig as spokesman in defense of Big Bang theory is the dog wagging the tail spokesman, for Craig has never been able to explain how Space in motion of a Big Bang expansion couples with material matter of the Cosmos. What ...
Show full article (7.18Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Pound and Rebka experiment falsifies big bang theory.     

Group: sci.astro · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.astro
Author: Eric Gisse
Date: Sep 19, 2008 06:41

... have not studied even slightly. Feel free to obtain the original HST data - it is right in the references of Knop's paper...b) PARALLAX. Were all SN1a inside our galaxy, their proper motion would be easily detectable. I never claimed all the SN were in...the standard model. Its' pointless and a sign you are clueless. Come on big boy, if you say the standard model has no bearing ...
Show full article (22.27Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Pound and Rebka experiment falsifies big bang theory.     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Original motion at the Big Bang in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Eric Gisse
Date: Sep 19, 2008 06:41

... have not studied even slightly. Feel free to obtain the original HST data - it is right in the references of Knop's paper...b) PARALLAX. Were all SN1a inside our galaxy, their proper motion would be easily detectable. I never claimed all the SN were in...the standard model. Its' pointless and a sign you are clueless. Come on big boy, if you say the standard model has no bearing ...
Show full article (22.27Kb) · Show article thread
2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · next