Optisism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 6 articles for 0.303 sec
I just bought HTC TyTN II with build in WM6 I set up my @msn.com account in the Windows Live for Windows Mobile application. The application eventhough it connects to the Messanger and show my online and offline contacts CAN NOT sync with my MSN mail account (meaning inbox,outbox and my custom folders). Ofcourse i have set up the options and i have checked the box that Suynchronize e-mail but     

Group: microsoft.public.windows.live.customdomains.techsupport.com · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in microsoft.public.windows.live.customdomains.techsupport.com
Author: Titos
Date: Feb 7, 2008 10:09

"Delbrayelle Gilbert" <delbrayelle@wanadoo.fr> a écrit dans le message de news:4608f513$0$27380$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr... vous vous etes perdus ? quel rapportavec l'optimisation materielle qui est l'objet de ce groupe ? Ben oui quand on n'est pas spécialiste , on se perd ... Une imprimante, c'est pas un matériel ? votre probleme ne concerne pas votre materiel il concerne la
Show full article (0.77Kb)
druck wrote: > On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: >> druck wrote: >>> On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: >>> Both were compiled with a similar level of optisation. >> Er, what? That's like saying two cars went the same speed because >> you drove them at the same speed. You didn't use -O3 and therefore >> you potentially didn't get the best results. If     

Group: fr.comp.materiel.optimisation · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in fr.comp.materiel.optimisation
Author: Az Sam
Date: Mar 27, 2007 11:47

On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: druck wrote: On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: Both were compiled with a similar level of optisation. Er, what? That's like saying two cars went the same speed because you drove them at the same speed. You didn't use -O3 and therefore you potentially didn't get the best results. If Norcroft had an
Show full article (0.94Kb) · Show article thread
druck wrote: > On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: >> druck wrote: >>> On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: >>>> It does? Evidence please - benchmarks have repeatedly shown GCC >>>> producing faster code. >>> Posted the other day for ARMalyser. Comparing the output from both >>> compilers linked against the same C runtimes (SCL or UnixLib), Norcroft >>> was     

Group: comp.sys.acorn.programmer · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Author: Peter Naulls
Date: Dec 21, 2006 16:36

On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: druck wrote: On 21 Dec 2006 Peter Naulls <peter@chocky.org> wrote: It does? Evidence please - benchmarks have repeatedly shown GCC producing faster code. Posted the other day for ARMalyser. Comparing the output from both compilers linked against the same C runtimes (SCL or UnixLib), Norcroft was marginally faster
Show full article (2.34Kb)
    

Group: comp.sys.acorn.programmer · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Author: druck
Date: Dec 21, 2006 16:08

Show full article (1.47Kb)
    

Group: comp.sys.acorn.programmer · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Author: Peter Naulls
Date: Dec 21, 2006 15:35

Show full article (1.87Kb)
    

Group: comp.sys.acorn.programmer · Group Profile · Search for Optisism in comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Author: druck
Date: Dec 21, 2006 11:15

Show full article (1.22Kb)