On Sep 9, 5:29 am, haterofneoc...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212/ Officials defend reimbursements, but trips with children raise questions. Why of course they do, because they all know that if they don't accede to the evil Barracuda Sarah Palin they will be fired. And her husband Todd has been getting money for doing work "representing" her? We thought
On Sep 9, 9:29 am, haterofneoc...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212/ Officials defend reimbursements, but trips with children raise questions. Why of course they do, because they all know that if they don't accede to the evil Barracuda Sarah Palin they will be fired. And her husband Todd has been getting money for doing work "representing" her? We thought
On Sep 9, 9:59 am, "Frank Arthur" <A...@Arthurian.com> wrote: "Hugh Wood" <BurtonU...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:16ef7b5e-5b7e-4fbb-90a9-3fff5a7adc8b@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com... On Sep 9, 8:29 am, haterofneoc...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212/ Officials defend reimbursements, but trips with children raise questions. Why of course they do
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:59:55 -0400, "Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote: "Hugh Wood" <BurtonUrny@gmail.com> wrote in message news:16ef7b5e-5b7e-4fbb-90a9-3fff5a7adc8b@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com... On Sep 9, 8:29 am, haterofneoc...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212/ Officials defend reimbursements, but trips with children raise questions. Why of course
On Sep 9, 8:29 am, haterofneoc...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212/ Officials defend reimbursements, but trips with children raise questions. Why of course they do, because they all know that if they don't accede to the evil Barracuda Sarah Palin they will be fired. And her husband Todd has been getting money for doing work "representing" her? We thought
