On Jul 13, 7:33 am, Greg Hansen <greg> wrote: Danny Milano wrote: I'm not going to reply comprehensively, just sniping here and there. Baird main counterarguments from his website mentioning what went wrong in the development of relativity (he is going for the kill): GR1915 is meant to be a superset of special relativity, with the equations and relationships
On Jul 13, 1:58 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Danny Milano wrote: [... quote from Einstein] From this Eric Baird built an entire theoretical structure about GR without SR ... Which is completely and utterly wrong. GR inherently and intrinsically includes SR: A) as the local limit of any manifold at any point B) as the unique solution to the
Eric Baird skrev: On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:05:42 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in Message-ID: <47A77E26.3070105@guesswhatuia.no>: ... I will admit that I am pulling your leg, Henri. :-) This scenario doesn't show the emission theory to be inconsistent. Of course they must and will count the same number of pulses. There is a subtle error in my calculation above.
On Jan 30, 9:34 am, Eric Baird wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:57:17 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Jan 16, 5:37 am, Eric Baird wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:29:16 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: One can never know how exactly silly Einsteinans draw their conclusions but at least one can guess. So this Eric Baird
On Jan 30, 9:34 am, Eric Baird wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:57:17 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Jan 16, 5:37 am, Eric Baird wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:29:16 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: One can never know how exactly silly Einsteinans draw their conclusions but at least one can guess. So this Eric Baird
