Nothinged
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 30 articles for 0.322 sec
On Jun 6, 8:21 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, PD wrote: > > On Jun 4, 6:38 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, PD wrote: > >>> On Jun 3, 6:57 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > > >>>> I kinda followed a lot of what you wrote. Yes, I see some problems > >>>> according to what you say. What it boils down to for me     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in sci.physics.relativity
Author: PD
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:15

On Jun 6, 8:21 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, PD wrote: On Jun 4, 6:38 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, PD wrote: On Jun 3, 6:57 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: I kinda followed a lot of what you wrote. Yes, I see some problems according to what you say. What it boils down to for me
Show full article (5.93Kb)
On Jun 6, 8:21 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, PD wrote: > > On Jun 4, 6:38 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, PD wrote: > >>> On Jun 3, 6:57 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...@mv.com> wrote: > > >>>> I kinda followed a lot of what you wrote. Yes, I see some problems > >>>> according to what you say. What it boils down to for me     

Group: alt.fan.jaimaharaj · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in alt.fan.jaimaharaj
Author: PD
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:15

Norbi wrote: Janion wrote: Enjoy...or don't, it's your choice. Is it really our choice? Can we choose to enjoy something or not? Of course the attitude going into it can have a huge change on the result, but can the event itself not be enough to make us feel something or not? Which leads us directly to the question if there is something like choice at all. And who
Show full article (5.93Kb)
On Fri, 14 May 2010 01:36:01 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: >niunian wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:32:04 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> >> wrote: >> >>>niunian wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:02:00 +0000 (UTC), oxtail >>>>     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in sci.physics
Author: PD
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:15

On Fri, 14 May 2010 01:36:01 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:32:04 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:02:00 +0000 (UTC), oxtail
Show full article (5.93Kb)
niunian wrote: > On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:32:04 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> > wrote: > >>niunian wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>niunian wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:02:00 +0000 (UTC), oxtail >>>>> <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Lee Frank" wrote     

Group: rec.juggling · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in rec.juggling
Author: Plorel
Date: May 14, 2010 00:53

niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:32:04 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 00:02:00 +0000 (UTC), oxtail <oxtail@nowhere.org> wrote: niunian wrote: "Lee Frank" wrote
Show full article (1.38Kb) · Show article thread
on the wayside, directly proportional means, not inversely proportional, as in the "inverse second-power law" that Hooke derived from Kepler's orbital constraints (and, it has nothing in particular to do with "skwares" .-) thus: the M-set's property of "universality" or self- similarity -- the mini-bugs like the big cardioid -- is strictly an artifact of the floating-point spec (and its     

Group: talk.religion.buddhism · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in talk.religion.buddhism
Author: niunian
Date: May 13, 2010 19:24

on the wayside, directly proportional means, not inversely proportional, as in the "inverse second-power law" that Hooke derived from Kepler's orbital constraints (and, it has nothing in particular to do with "skwares" .-) thus: the M-set's property of "universality" or self- similarity -- the mini-bugs like the big cardioid -- is strictly an artifact of the floating-point spec (and its
Show full article (4.17Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.zen · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in alt.zen
Author: niunian
Date: May 13, 2010 19:24

Show full article (4.17Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.religion.buddhism · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in talk.religion.buddhism
Author: oxtail
Date: May 13, 2010 18:36

Show full article (3.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.zen · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in alt.zen
Author: oxtail
Date: May 13, 2010 18:36

Show full article (3.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in sci.physics.relativity
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 12:21

Show full article (4.92Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Nothinged in sci.physics
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 12:21

Show full article (4.92Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · next