| On May 9, 4:08 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> On May 9, 12:08 am, Dan <B24...@AOL.COM> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5/9/2011 1:58 AM, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > > On May 8, 10:59 pm, Dan<B24...@AOL.COM> wrote:
> > >> On 5/8/2011 10:33 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > >>> On May 8, 5:28 pm, Dean Markley<damark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On May 8, 4:10 pm, Dan<B24...@AOL.COM |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Not Withstanding in rec.aviation.military
Author: Dean Markley
Date: May 9, 2011 06:28
In article <huke4t$efe$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> wrote: Yowie wrote: Seebs wrote: However, from my admittedly limited understanding of Quakerism, don't Quakers judge the message rather than the messenger? When possible, yes. I tried "Hate the sin, love the sinner" approach with my abusive first wife. She took advantage
| 
