Normailty
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 9 articles for 0.062 sec
"Clive Braham" <clive@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in news:55gnhgF251uvcU1@mid.individual.net: > > "Mister Niceguy" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:Xns98EFBE0D0E52Cniceguyonzetnet@194.247.47.119... >>> >>> Of course the merger makes for a net loss of flights but I think we >>> will be in better hands with Flybe who like the regions wereas BA >>> never did, other than feeding     

Group: alt.airports.uk.edinburgh · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in alt.airports.uk.edinburgh
Author: Mister Niceguy
Date: Mar 11, 2007 01:38

"Mister Niceguy" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:Xns98EFBE0D0E52Cniceguyonzetnet@194.247.47.119... Of course the merger makes for a net loss of flights but I think we will be in better hands with Flybe who like the regions wereas BA never did, other than feeding their London bases. Don't get carried away, Clive. Flybe's intl routes from EDI were minimal or non existant
Show full article (1.24Kb)
Herman Rubin wrote: > In article <pdeho2htl111mmkk4rem323igpla34h3fn@4ax.com>, > Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulrich@comcast.net> wrote: > >On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:42:38 -0800, "David A. Heiser" > ><dah_box1@innercite.com> wrote: > > <> What us good method of dealing with the problem of finding a correlation > <> coefficient between two sets of data, in which the sets have unequal length. > <> The     

Group: alt.airports.uk.edinburgh · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in alt.airports.uk.edinburgh
Author: Clive Braham
Date: Mar 10, 2007 13:50

Ivor Jones wrote: "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0-qdneAJzPfP43rZRVnyrg@bt.com Ivor Jones wrote: "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com [snip] Standing by your principles is good, unless you're wrong. Which you are. You don't know me. You cannot even begin to
Show full article (0.67Kb)
Ivor Jones wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:0-qdneAJzPfP43rZRVnyrg@bt.com >> Ivor Jones wrote: >>> "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> Standing by your principles is good, unless you're >>>> wrong. Which you are. >>> >>> You don't know me. You cannot even begin to     

Group: sci.stat.math · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in sci.stat.math
Author: Reef Fish
Date: Dec 20, 2006 10:16

"Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0-qdneAJzPfP43rZRVnyrg@bt.com Ivor Jones wrote: "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com [snip] Standing by your principles is good, unless you're wrong. Which you are. You don't know me. You cannot even begin to know whether
Show full article (3.29Kb) · Show article thread
"Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0-qdneAJzPfP43rZRVnyrg@bt.com > Ivor Jones wrote: > > "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com > > > > [snip] > > > > > Standing by your principles is good, unless you're > > > wrong. Which you are. > > > > You don't know me. You cannot even begin to know > > whether     

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Brimstone
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:37

Ivor Jones wrote: "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com [snip] Standing by your principles is good, unless you're wrong. Which you are. You don't know me. You cannot even begin to know whether I'm right or wrong. I'm referring only to this conversation, in which your stance is wrong. And I'm *still*
Show full article (0.99Kb)
Ivor Jones wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:ReOdnUU-DIik4HrZnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com > > [snip] > >> Standing by your principles is good, unless you're wrong. >> Which you are. > > You don't know me. You cannot even begin to know whether I'm right or > wrong. I'm referring only to this conversation, in which your stance is wrong. > > And I'm *still*     

Group: uk.rec.caravanning · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.caravanning
Author: Brimstone
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:37

Show full article (0.99Kb)
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:21

Show full article (0.90Kb)
    

Group: uk.rec.caravanning · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.caravanning
Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:21

Show full article (0.90Kb)
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Brimstone
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:10

Show full article (0.62Kb)
    

Group: uk.rec.caravanning · Group Profile · Search for Normailty in uk.rec.caravanning
Author: Brimstone
Date: Aug 19, 2006 14:10

Show full article (0.62Kb)