...warning "contains no more than 2%% alcohol" I remember cans of shandy and ...beverages containing up to 0.5%% alcohol by volume (ABV) can be legally called non-alcoholic according to the Volstead Act. Due to the extremely low alcohol content present in various brands of... (correct at May 2007): No alcohol/alcohol free: not more than 0...more than 0.5%% ABV Low alcohol: not more than 1.2%% ...

...in respect of the indication of alcoholic strength. 11. Specified descriptions can ...0.05%%. 12. Furthermore, the description “non-alcoholic” shall not be used ... name commonly associated with an alcoholic drink, except in the composite ... Labelling Regulations." In Scotland, an "alcoholic drink" is merely defined as ... drink consisting of or containing alcohol" [s.147(1) Licensing (Scotland)...

...: The example of the US Prohibition era make alcohol consumption immune from such nannying. Prohibition of non-alcoholic drugs today causes exactly the same problems as alcohol prohibition did in the USA. That doesn't ...prohibition from being a popular policy. Well, a ban on alcohol would piss off the conservative right - unlike one on...

.... A long way off I think. The example of the US Prohibition era make alcohol consumption immune from such nannying. Prohibition of non-alcoholic drugs today causes exactly the same problems as alcohol prohibition did in the USA. That doesn't stop prohibition from being a popular policy. Svenne

...I'll just give a short version without many references. First, the only good epidemiologic study on non-alcoholic liquids and kidney stones showed that all such liquids except grapefruit juice were roughly equally negatively ...found (see wikipedia article on it) in soy sauce and many alcoholic beverages. On an only marginally related note, I just have to...

...May 14, 4:13 pm, Executive Function wrote: ...can you get in touch with my current nick? I could do with some advice, non alcohol related. Nothing to do with chickens. Why would you post this publicly instead of contacting him directly? Speaking personally, I wouldn't consider someone's participation ...

On May 14, 4:13 pm, Executive Function wrote: ...can you get in touch with my current nick? I could do with some advice, non alcohol related. Nothing to do with chickens. Why would you post this publicly instead of contacting him directly?

...:g0flao$2ip$1@registered.motzarella.org... Executive Function wrote: ...can you get in touch with my current nick? I could do with some advice, non alcohol related. Nothing to do with chickens. I suspect Tom is busy with real life at present; he hasn't been posting here as much as he ...

..., Absorbed <purestdeform...@hotmail.com> wrote: Executive Function wrote: ...can you get in touch with my current nick?  I could do with some advice, non alcohol related.  Nothing to do with chickens. I suspect Tom is busy with real life at present; he hasn't been posting here as much as he ...

Executive Function wrote: ...can you get in touch with my current nick? I could do with some advice, non alcohol related. Nothing to do with chickens. I suspect Tom is busy with real life at present; he hasn't been posting here as much as he usually does.