Ted van de Weteringe wrote: Carl Douglas wrote: So the more we medicalise our sport, the better? Bollocks. Of course not, and I never said that. Not banning does not equal mandating. Everyone is responsible for his own actions in his leisure time. I would never shoot up EPO, for instance. Well bully for you. But EPO works. So does HGH. So does THG. And so do a whole

foad wrote: "lescor" <lescorbett@btinternet.com> wrote in message The drug restrictions imposed outside the USA are as much to do with husbandry as anything else. Isn't one of the reasons chemicals are banned that you eurotrash barbarians eat horses and are worried about the human health effects? "In 2006, the last year for which figures are available, 18,991 horses

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:18:57 GMT, "klunk" <klunk@theothershoe.org> wrote: |>> That's what happens between 80,000 to 100,000 times annually according to the |>> US DOJ. But according to Gary Kleck, that's what happens about 2,500,000 times |>> ANNUALLY. |>> Don't you consider that a GOOD THING ? |>> |> |>what is a good thing for your cause is that 2.5 million people per year can |>attest