Leif902 wrote: On Feb 16, 12:28 pm, "Ed Cryer" <e...@somewhere.in.the.uk> wrote: "Leif902" <leif...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6d7c7ead-7962-4343-8baa-3c37cdde16ff@o10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... Ah sorry, you're response is great, but as with all good answers, it brought me more questions. I have never used "Nexus" or "Flexus" before so I looked them

In article <rcousine-0CBB14.17421706052007@news.telus.net>, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote: In article <slrnf3sopc.2n8.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: On 2007-05-06, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: Jasper Janssen wrote: On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:49:29 -0500, Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: Yes, nexus the noun

In article <slrnf3sopc.2n8.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: On 2007-05-06, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: Jasper Janssen wrote: On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:49:29 -0500, Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: Yes, nexus the noun is 4th declension, but "nexus" could also be the perfect passive participle of necto, which would decline like

>> Jasper Janssen wrote: On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:49:29 -0500, Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: Yes, nexus the noun is 4th declension, but "nexus" could also be the perfect passive participle of necto, which would decline like a 2nd declension, with plural nexi. I don't know which Shimano intended. I've got a pretty good feeling about it actually being the ENGLISH word

Spam. Unsolicited e-mail report follows: Memo #80673 (1429) From piter@ars-necto.com Tue May 1 19:26:45 2007 Received: from ****************** (****************** [***************]) by **********.********* (8.11.3/***/8.11.2) with ESMTP id l41IQic10241 for <*****************************>; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:26:45 +0100 (BST) X-Envelope-From: piter@ars-necto.com Received: from host202-196